Answering Kennedy’s Call
“And on the tax front, it’s time for rich people like me to pay more.” Mitt Romney
This quote from a recent NYTimes Mitt Romney Op-ed is my Christmas message: Equal opportunity hasn’t been available to many Americans, even though it is part of the American Dream—America is the land of opportunity that is taught in schools and heard by immigrants.
Why? Because it’s a larger economic truth that not all Americans have accepted. Equality is good for everyone. It should be self-evident, a statement of common sense. The more equality of opportunity among us, the more we can better ourselves, become more productive citizens, which in turn increases our national wealth (and lowers budget deficits).
It was certainly the dream of immigrants, such as my mother, a British citizen born in Jamaica.
But there are times such as today when many Americans don’t believe it is possible, which is why we are living in another Gilded Age with the worst income inequality of the developed world. It is on a par with developing countries in Africa and has been the major cause of recessions and the Great Depression.
Many have bought the counter narrative by those that don’t like equality, such as Donald Trump and his MAGA supporters, part of the privileged few at the top of the income ladder who want us to believe they are the most qualified to create greater wealth for the rest of us.
This Gilded Age was formed like the last Gilded Age of President William McKinley, from a concentration of power among the wealthiest oligarchs. Then it was monopolies in such as the newly created railroad and oil industries.
Today, it is small government policies of Donald Trump that mirror the trickle-down economic policies of President Reagan because enough Americans believed it, believed government was the problem and cutting taxes the solution, believed that equality is not good for everyone because we live in a zero-sum world with limited resources. What is given to one must be taken from another.
The conservative position espoused by 1970s Economist Arthur Okun, for instance, was that greater equality meant less market efficiencies to produce and so fewer incentives for greater wealth, since leveling the playing field meant leveling out the opportunity for large profits.
But that has never been the case. There has always been copious evidence that the opposite is true; that overly large profits have led to diminished household wealth and breakup of communities.
One can measure inequality with such as the CIA’s World Factbook that ranks inequality among nations. Those with the greatest equality also have less violence, greater freedoms, greater health, and guaranteed vacations!
Richard Wilkinson’s TEDx lecture and book with Kate Pickett, “The Spirit Level” is one of the best studies of the dire effects of income inequality on the quality of life. The most important factor, and a sign of dire consequences when inequality has approached the level of the Great Depression, are the US violent crime and incarceration rates, which Wilkinson discusses at length.
The U.S. is by far the most violent country in the world—worse than any other developed country with the highest incarceration rates. Efforts to reverse such inequality have begun on the local levels, even if congressional conservatives have blocked raising the miniscule national minimum wage of $7.25 per hour that was last set in 2009.
It is worth just $5 per hour today whereas blue states like California and Connecticut have raised their minimum wage to $16.90 per hour in line with rising livings costs.
And there is an increasing awareness of the income disparities, such as the fact that corporate CEOs now earn more than 300 times the income of their employees, and certain hedge fund managers have reported an annual income of $1 billion.
The Center for American Progress launched the Washington Center For Equitable Growth, which aims to deepen the economic critique of inequality. It was set up by Berkeley economist Emmanuel Saez, among others, who is known with his partner Thomas Piketty as the first economists to historically research the history of income distribution over the past 100 years.
The mission statement of the Center explains why it is needed:
“New research suggests that growing inequality in the United States may have broad social and economic effects — by reducing stable demand for goods and services, dampening entrepreneurialism, undermining the inclusiveness and responsiveness of political and economic institutions, limiting access to education, and stunting individual development. Yet our understanding of how these mechanisms interact with the broader economy is limited.”
Mitt Romney’s Op-ed has voiced one of the major issues confronting Americans today—how to fix the overwhelming federal debt load that threatens the ‘full faith and credit’ of the U.S. government.
“The largest source of additional tax revenues is also probably the most compelling for the fairness and social stability. Some call it closing a tax code loophole but the term “loopholes” grossly understates their scale. “Caverns” or “caves” would be more fitting,” said Romney
Donald Trump’s flailing attempts to use higher tariffs to pay down federal debt, when it is in fact another tax on all Americans, is maybe the most important reason to follow Mitt Romney’s advice.
Taxing the wealthiest that haven’t been “paying their fair share”, including Donald Trump’s billionaire supporters, would close one of the largest loopholes that is endangering the U.S. economy, as Senator Bernie Sanders continually reminds us.
Harlan Green © 2025
Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen
Populareconomicsblog 