Construction Boosted By Public Works, Offices

The Mortgage Corner

We are already seeing the results of the $1.1T budget agreement, and $305 STIRR Surface Transportation and Highway Trust Fund bill. Construction spending rose a strong 1.5 percent in January due to a surge in highway & street spending as well as gains for manufacturing and on Federal construction projects.

image

Graph: Calculated Risk

This is incredible news, as it is the first time that Repubs and Democrats agreed on federal spending since the great sequester cut spending across the board in 2011. The result will be much needed repairs of our almost century-old infrastructure. Remember those Flint, Michigan lead drinking water pipes?

We may be finally turning the corner on neglect of our public infrastructure, so held back by the austerity policies of one political party. There was an impressive 33.9 percent gain for highways & streets (mostly done by states), and a smaller 9.9 percent increase in the Federal category.

And also in the private sector, private nonresidential components, namely offices, had a 24.8 percent year-on-year gain. This is another sign of increased business investment.

But the housing sector also benefited on the multi-family side, reflecting strength in rental prices. Year-on-year spending on rental housing is up 30.4 percent vs 6.6 percent for single-family homes. Together, residential spending is up a huge year-on-year 7.7 percent.

The availability of acquisition, development and construction (AD&C) loans has been a factor holding back a stronger rebound in home construction until now, but easing credit conditions and a growing loan base should help expand the residential building market.

According to the National Association of Home Builders and FDIC analysis, the outstanding stock of 1-4 unit residential construction loans made by FDIC-insured institutions rose by $2.6 billion during the fourth quarter of 2015, raising the total stock of outstanding loans to $60.9 billion.

image

Graph: NAHB.org

“On a year-over-year basis, the stock of residential construction loans is up 18.9%, as indicated by the red bars in the graph above. The current reading is higher than the 16% to 17.5% annual growth rate range that the series had been in for the prior year and a half, says the NAHB. “This change suggests accelerating single-family building growth in 2016, which is consistent with NAHB’s forecast. Since the first quarter of 2013, the stock of outstanding home building construction loans has grown by 49%, an increase of $20.1 billion.”

This is further evidence the housing market is just beginning to recover. Banks are finally lending again, and interest rates are at record lows, with the 10-year TBond yield at 1.76 percent and 30-year conforming fixed rates as low as 3.25 percent in California.

Harlan Green © 2016

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Posted in Consumers, Economy, Housing, housing market, Politics, Weekly Financial News | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Higher GDP, Consumer Spending Will Boost 2016 Growth

Financial FAQs

Q4 GDP growth was just revised upward to 1.0 percent, from the 0.7 percent first estimate.  This, January’s personal income figures and durable goods orders show consumers and even parts of the manufacturing sector are still expanding, which is a good start for 2016 growth vs. last January, when the severe winter stopped almost all growth in Q1.

image

Graph: Marketwatch

Median annual household income rose 0.7 Percent in November, or $57,173, according to a just released Sentier Research report. It was in November that incomes finally surpassed the $56,698 median seen at the onset of the Great Recession.  Why is this important?

“We have recaptured all of the income losses that have occurred since the beginning of the last recession in December 2007,” said Sentier’s Gordon Green, a former U.S. Census Bureau official. And incomes are now up 0.4 percent from where they stood in January 2000—the month that Sentier Research began tracking this data.

image

Graph: Econoday

Personal income jumped 0.5 percent in January as did consumer spending, both readings higher than expected. Also higher than expected are the report’s inflation readings especially the core PCE which rose 0.3 percent for a year-on-year plus 1.7 percent.

And the factory sector bounced back strongly in January, indicated first by last week’s industrial production report and now by durable goods orders which are up a very strong 4.9 percent. Aircraft did add to the gain but when excluding transportation equipment, durable orders still rose 1.8 percent. And core capital goods orders, which had been weakening, bounced back strongly with a 3.9 percent gain.

Machinery posted big gains in the month especially for new orders as did computers and fabricated metals. Motor vehicles showed strength in both orders and shipments. Total shipments jumped 1.9 percent in the month, though shipments of core capital goods, held down by prior weakness in orders, fell 0.4 percent to open the first quarter on a down note, says Econoday.

But a positive in the report is a 0.1 percent dip in inventories which, together with the rise in shipments, pulls down the inventory-to-shipments ratio to a leaner 1.64 from 1.67. And unfilled orders, after contracting sharply in December, inched 0.1 percent ahead in January.

Wages and salaries are now rising at 4.5 percent year-over-year. It is the most important number to look at in the personal income statistics, because it is the major reason consumers are spending more after a year of saving from lower gas prices. These salary earners make up 80 percent of our workforce, which is sure to boost GDP growth above 3 percent this year, as we have been saying.

Harlan Green © 2016

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Posted in Consumers, Economy, Weekly Financial News | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Why Did Michael Moore Invade Those Countries?

Popular Economics Weekly

The answer is so simple, and sad. Mr. Moore’s latest eye-opening documentary, “Where To Invade Next” visits countries that have learned from, and adopted our laws and policies, policies that no longer exist in the U.S. of A.; such as tuition-free public colleges (Slovenia), prison systems that rehabilitate rather than punish (Norway), where drug use is not a crime (Portugal), and 8 weeks paid vacation is the law (Italy).

His film shows America on the way to becoming a Third World country, somewhat lost in the last century and falling behind other developed countries and many developing countries, in caring for our citizens.

Perhaps the most moving segment was that on women’s rights. We who were not able to pass the Equal Rights Amendment that prevented discrimination against women in the 1970s, were imitated in countries like Iceland with the first democratically elected President in 1980, and where women’s rights are enshrined in their constitution (Tunisia, a Muslim country).

For some reason, beginning in the 1970s, these countries began to give more rights to their citizens, while America, the world’s oldest democracy, took them away. Germany has enshrined collective bargaining in their corporations, where 50 percent of the governing board has to be made up of its employees, whereas many states in the U.S. have either banned collective bargaining, or the paying of dues to support collective bargaining, in 25 right to work states.

And Icelandic corporations must have at least 40 percent of each gender on their boards, which was made law after 2008 and the collapse of their banking system. The 3 largest banks all filed for bankruptcy, and some of their all-male executives went to jail, the result of “excessive, testosterone-driven risk taking” said a commentator on their trials. The result was a mass revolt by Iceland’s women that demanded a greater role in the running of their own country.

Michael Moore interviewed Iceland’s special prosecutor for financial crimes, Olafur Hauksson, who said he had learned his prosecution techniques from Bill Black, a U.S. special prosecutor who had convicted bank executives resulting from our Savings and Loan scandal. But no U.S. executive has been prosecuted since, much less convicted, for their excessive risk-taking and disregard of financial regulations during the subprime meltdown and Great Recession.

Why have such more modern democracies passed us by? Moore hints that maybe they have learned from their horrific past of religious and world wars to care better for their citizens. But the U.S. hasn’t learned from the biggest stain on our democracy—slavery. We still enslave mostly African Americans in our prisons, thanks to the war on drugs initiated by President Nixon, after President Johnson had signed the Civil Rights Act that finally gave Blacks the same rights as other American citizens.

Graph: Policy.mic

While crime rates have gone down, the number of people incarcerated has gone up in U.S. prisons. According to Human Rights Watch, 2.3 million people were incarcerated as of 2007. The United States has the largest incarceration rate in the world with a staggering 762 per 100,000 residents. Compare this to the U.K. whose rate is 152 per 100,000 residents, or Canada whose rate is 102.

So many prisoners create a large workforce. According to truth-out and the Left Business Observer, “the federal prison industry produces 100 percent of all military helmets, ammunition belts, bullet-proof vests, ID tags, shirts, pants, tents, bags, and canteens. Along with war supplies, prison workers supply 98 percent of the entire market for equipment assembly services; 93 percent of paints and paintbrushes; 92 percent of stove assembly; 46 percent of body armor; 36 percent of home appliances; 30 percent of headphones/microphones/speakers; and 21 percent of office furniture. Airplane parts, medical supplies, and much more: prisoners are even raising seeing-eye dogs for blind people.”

And why do we no longer have tuition-free public colleges? It perhaps began when Ronald Reagan was elected Governor of California in 1966, UC Berkeley was a hotbed of protests, and tuition-free for California residents.

Governor Reagan didn’t believe such an education should be free for rebellious college students. His most famous action of that time was the firing of the UC Berkeley Chancellor Clark Kerr for not following his orders to ban the student protests. Reagan vowed to “clean up that mess in Berkeley,” warned audiences of “sexual orgies so vile that I cannot describe them to you,” complained that outside agitators were bringing left-wing subversion into the university, and railed against spoiled children of privilege skipping their classes to go to protests, according to Dissent Magazine, describing that time.

“He cut state funding for higher education, laid the foundations for a shift to a tuition-based funding model, and called in the National Guard to crush student protest, which it did with unprecedented severity. But he was only able to do this because he had already successfully shifted the political debate over the meaning and purpose of public higher education in America.”

California was becoming more conservative, in other words. Instead of seeing the education of the state’s youth as a patriotic duty and a vital weapon in the Cold War, Reagan cast universities as a problem in and of themselves—“both an expensive welfare program and dangerously close to socialism”. He even argued for the importance of tuition-based funding by suggesting that if students had to pay, they’d value their education too much to protest.

Reagan’s assault against higher education was only the beginning of the neo-cons attack on our educational system. Their real purpose was an attempt to dumb down the electorate by crippling our public school and university systems. The fewer that were well educated meant the fewer could challenge the power of those that supported the so-called Reagan Revolution.

So there is a reason our educational system ranks lower than 20 or more countries in the world, in the major subjects. M Moore visited Finland to learn why they are ranked #1 in the world, according to the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), “a standardized test given to 15-year-olds in more than 40 global venues.”

He interviewed teachers, students, and education officials. They all said their students’ welfare came first, and standardized tests should be abandoned. They had learned from our educational system that once upon a time allowed more free time for social interaction, little or no homework, when music and art were an important part of our educational curriculum from elementary school onward.

Perhaps that is the saddest revelation of Michael’s film. How the U.S. of A. has come to undervalue the lives of so many American citizens, including our own women and children.

Harlan Green © 2016

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Why Did Michael Moore Invade Other Countries?

Popular Economics Weekly

The answer is so simple, and sad. Mr. Moore’s latest eye-opening documentary, “Where To Invade Next” visits countries that have learned from, and adopted our laws and policies, policies that no longer exist in the U.S. of A.; such as tuition-free public colleges (Slovenia), prison systems that rehabilitate rather than punish (Norway), where drug use is not a crime (Portugal), and 8 weeks paid vacation is the law (Italy).

His film shows America on the way to becoming a Third World country, somewhat lost in the last century and falling behind other developed countries and many developing countries, in caring for our citizens.

Perhaps the most moving segment was that on women’s rights. We who were not able to pass the Equal Rights Amendment that prevented discrimination against women in the 1970s, were imitated in countries like Iceland with the first democratically elected President in 1980, and where women’s rights are enshrined in their constitution (Tunisia, a Muslim country).

For some reason, beginning in the 1970s, these countries began to give more rights to their citizens, while America, the world’s oldest democracy, took them away. Germany has enshrined collective bargaining in their corporations, where 50 percent of the governing board has to be made up of its employees, whereas many states in the U.S. have either banned collective bargaining, or the paying of dues to support collective bargaining, in 25 right to work states.

And Icelandic corporations must have at least 40 percent of each gender on their boards, which was made law after 2008 and the collapse of their banking system. The 3 largest banks all filed for bankruptcy, and some of their all-male executives went to jail, the result of “excessive, testosterone-driven risk taking” said a commentator on their trials. The result was a mass revolt by Iceland’s women that demanded a greater role in the running of their own country.

Michael Moore interviewed Iceland’s special prosecutor for financial crimes, Olafur Hauksson, who said he had learned his prosecution techniques from Bill Black, a U.S. special prosecutor who had convicted bank executives resulting from our Savings and Loan scandal. But no U.S. executive has been prosecuted since, much less convicted, for their excessive risk-taking and disregard of financial regulations during the subprime meltdown and Great Recession.

Why have such more modern democracies passed us by? Moore hints that maybe they have learned from their horrific past of religious and world wars to care better for their citizens. But the U.S. hasn’t learned from the biggest stain on our democracy—slavery. We still enslave mostly African Americans in our prisons, thanks to the war on drugs initiated by President Nixon, after President Johnson had signed the Civil Rights Act that finally gave Blacks the same rights as other American citizens.

Graph: Policy.mic

While crime rates have gone down, the number of people incarcerated has gone up in U.S. prisons. According to Human Rights Watch, 2.3 million people were incarcerated as of 2007. The United States has the largest incarceration rate in the world with a staggering 762 per 100,000 residents. Compare this to the U.K. whose rate is 152 per 100,000 residents, or Canada whose rate is 102.

So many prisoners create a large workforce. According to truth-out and the Left Business Observer, “the federal prison industry produces 100 percent of all military helmets, ammunition belts, bullet-proof vests, ID tags, shirts, pants, tents, bags, and canteens. Along with war supplies, prison workers supply 98 percent of the entire market for equipment assembly services; 93 percent of paints and paintbrushes; 92 percent of stove assembly; 46 percent of body armor; 36 percent of home appliances; 30 percent of headphones/microphones/speakers; and 21 percent of office furniture. Airplane parts, medical supplies, and much more: prisoners are even raising seeing-eye dogs for blind people.”

And why do we no longer have tuition-free public colleges? It perhaps began when Ronald Reagan was elected Governor of California in 1966, UC Berkeley was a hotbed of protests, and tuition-free for California residents.

Governor Reagan didn’t believe such an education should be free for rebellious college students. His most famous action of that time was the firing of the UC Berkeley Chancellor Clark Kerr for not following his orders to ban the student protests. Reagan vowed to “clean up that mess in Berkeley,” warned audiences of “sexual orgies so vile that I cannot describe them to you,” complained that outside agitators were bringing left-wing subversion into the university, and railed against spoiled children of privilege skipping their classes to go to protests, according to Dissent Magazine, describing that time.

“He cut state funding for higher education, laid the foundations for a shift to a tuition-based funding model, and called in the National Guard to crush student protest, which it did with unprecedented severity. But he was only able to do this because he had already successfully shifted the political debate over the meaning and purpose of public higher education in America.”

California was becoming more conservative, in other words. Instead of seeing the education of the state’s youth as a patriotic duty and a vital weapon in the Cold War, Reagan cast universities as a problem in and of themselves—“both an expensive welfare program and dangerously close to socialism”. He even argued for the importance of tuition-based funding by suggesting that if students had to pay, they’d value their education too much to protest.

Reagan’s assault against higher education was only the beginning of the neo-cons attack on our educational system. Their real purpose was an attempt to dumb down the electorate by crippling our public school and university systems. The fewer that were well educated meant the fewer could challenge the power of those that supported the so-called Reagan Revolution.

So there is a reason our educational system ranks lower than 20 or more countries in the world, in the major subjects. M Moore visited Finland to learn why they are ranked #1 in the world, according to the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), “a standardized test given to 15-year-olds in more than 40 global venues.”

He interviewed teachers, students, and education officials. They all said their students’ welfare came first, and standardized tests should be abandoned. They had learned from our educational system that once upon a time allowed more free time for social interaction, little or no homework, when music and art were an important part of our educational curriculum from elementary school onward.

Perhaps that is the saddest revelation of Michael’s film. How the U.S. of A. has come to undervalue the lives of so many American citizens, including our own women and children.

Harlan Green © 2016

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Posted in Politics | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Huge Jump In Existing-Home Sales

The Mortgage Corner

Wow! Total existing-home sales, which are completed transactions that include single-family homes, townhomes, condominiums and co-ops, rose 0.4 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 5.47 million in January from a downwardly revised 5.45 million in December. Sales are now 11.0 percent higher than a year ago – the largest year-over-year gain since July 2013 (16.3 percent).

image

Graph: Calculated Risk

This is creating a bottle neck for home buyers, as the unsold inventory of homes is down to 4 months, with such a hot sales market. Yet first-time home buyers are hanging in there with 32 percent of sales, up from 28 percent last year, and below the 40 percent during more normal times.

The median existing-home price for all housing types in January was $213,800, up 8.2 percent from January 2015 ($197,600). Last month’s price increase was the largest since April 2015 (8.5 percent) and marks the 47th consecutive month of year-over-year gains.

Lawrence Yun, NAR chief economist, says existing sales kicked off 2016 on solid footing, rising slightly to the strongest pace since July 2015 (5.48 million). “The housing market has shown promising resilience in recent months, but home prices are still rising too fast because of ongoing supply constraints,” he said. “Despite the global economic slowdown, the housing sector continues to recover and will likely help the U.S. economy avoid a recession.”

The S&P/Case-Shiller U.S. National Home Price Index, a more accurate measure of overall existing-home prices because it uses a 3-month average of same existing-home prices, recorded a slightly higher year-over-year gain with a 5.4 percent annual increase in December 2015 versus a 5.2 percent increase in November 2015.

Portland, Denver and San Francisco prices continue to rise the fastest, with more than 10 percent annual increases. But Tampa and Seattle are close behind. These prices reflect the growing prosperity of high growth regions, and are reflected in a recent survey of cities and regions with the most job creation.

image

Graph: Marketwatch

This incredible graph captures where job growth is actually happening—on the coasts for the most part. Marketwatch says cost-estimating website HowMuch.net used data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to create this three-dimensional representation of the number of jobs added by metro area. It should be no surprise that California with its Silicon Valley led all states with more than 464,000 jobs related.

The Greater New York metropolitan area, which includes Newark and Jersey City, showed the highest increase for any single metro area in the country with 156,400 new jobs. And, the Los Angeles metro area, including Long Beach and Anaheim, was second at 135,100 jobs.

This means more housing is needed and the construction industry is finally beginning to respond, with housing starts now above a 1 million unit rate, and permits for new housing even higher. Why are first-timers able to buy? The medium household income has also risen, up 6.5 percent since 2013, and interest rates are back to historical lows, making home buying more affordable.

But a continuing housing recovery is dependent on more and higher paying jobs. We know the millennial generation, from 18 to 36 years, will be key to this happening. They now make up 53 percent of the work force.

However, their pay is still at the low end, according to data from the Minnesota Population Center’s 2014 “American Community Survey” in the Integrated Public Use Microdata Series. The medians ranged between a low of $18,000 per year in Montana and a high of $43,000 in the District of Columbia. It’s because so many are still teenagers or in school. But that should change in coming years.

Harlan Green © 2016

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Posted in Consumers, Housing, Weekly Financial News | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Inflation Is Bringing Back Higher Growth!

Popular Economics Weekly

Consumer prices are on the rise and the Fed’s December rate hike doesn’t look misplaced at all, says Econoday. Year-on-year core prices (without food and energy prices) rose 1 tenth to plus 2.2 percent for the highest rate in more than 3-1/2 years. This rate, as tracked in the line of the accompanying graph, is breaching the 2 percent policy line that isn’t going unnoticed at the Fed.

 image

Graph: Econoday

Yet this is exactly what is needed to presage higher economic growth this year. It has been the lack of inflation that has kept the Fed from raising interest rates sooner. Why? Because inflation leads interest rates, not the reverse. I.e., prices have to rise before banks react by raising their lending rates. Barron’s economist Gene Epstein predicts 3 percent plus GDP growth this year, almost one percent above the consensus of so-called ‘blue chip” economists.

In fact, higher inflation has to accompany higher growth, since profits can’t increase without the ability of businesses to raise their prices at or above the inflation rate. And growing profits are the only circumstance that will cause businesses to expand and create more jobs.

image

Barron’s Epstein bases his upbeat prognosis on continued healthy consumer spending that will overshadow the drop in manufacturing and exports, in particular. Ex-gas retail sales month-to-month (the dark columns) expanded for seven months in a row which matches the longest streak in five years. Year-on-year, ex-gas sales are at a very respectable plus 4.5 percent and reflect special strength in vehicle sales, up 6.9 percent on the year.

Consumers are less optimistic about their prospects this year, but will still spend more. The Index now stands at 92.2 (1985=100), down from 97.8 in January. “Consumer confidence decreased in February, after posting a modest gain in January,” said Lynn Franco, Director of Economic Indicators at The Conference Board. “Continued turmoil in the financial markets may be rattling consumers, but their assessment of current conditions suggests the economy will continue to expand at a moderate pace in the near-term.”

The housing market and governments also have to contribute some spending to boost growth above the 2.4 percent GDP rate predicted by most economists. Housing starts (ie, construction) are holding above 1 million units per year, and existing-home sales have soared to a 5.47 million annual rate in January. That was the second-highest monthly pace since 2007 and 11 percent higher than the same period a year ago.  But it could also mean a housing shortage, as existing-home inventories dropped to a 4-month supply.

State and local governments have also increased their spending on education and infrastructure upgrades, in particular. And, the federal $305B STIRR transportation highway bill, and $1.1 trillion current year spending agreement should boost federally financed programs that contribute to increased growth. President Obama signed the $1.1 trillion spending package on December 17 to fund the government through next September, averting the risk of a government shutdown. The measure removes the threat of a government shutdown until Sept. 30, about a month before the 2016 elections, and the beginning of the new fiscal year.

What better reason for optimism can there be than removing the threat of a government shutdown? This, and some rising inflation are in fact all good reasons for our optimistic prediction of better growth this year.

Harlan Green © 2016

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Posted in Consumers, Economy, Housing, housing market, Weekly Financial News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

How Extreme is Bernie’s Economic Vision?

Popular Economics Weekly

Major progressive economists are protesting Bernie Sanders predictions of robust economic growth and jobs if his policies are enacted. What are his policies? Policies he claims will give Americans what the other developed countries already offer to their citizens, including a higher minimum wage, tuition-free public university education, universal health care, and better retirement benefits.

Then why are progressive economists protesting, who presumably have similar goals? Because we are not like other developed countries, and so shouldn’t be exaggerating the benefits of such assertions, says Paul Krugman.

“On Wednesday four former Democratic chairmen and chairwomen of the president’s Council of Economic Advisers — three who served under Barack Obama, one who served under Bill Clinton — released a stinging open letter to Bernie Sanders and Gerald Friedman, a University of Massachusetts professor who has been a major source of the Sanders campaign’s numbers,” said Krugman. “The economists called out the campaign for citing “extreme claims” by Mr. Friedman that “exceed even the most grandiose predictions by Republicans” and could “undermine the credibility of the progressive economic agenda.”

Why are the Sanders-Freidman claims so extreme? Because Dr. Friedman claims he can achieve those goals in just ten years, if the body politic will back Bernie. The late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia over some 30 years led conservative attempts to turn the clock back at least one century to a time when the white male patriarchy still ruled.

Whereas Senator Sanders wants to move the economic clock into the next century. “Like the New Deal of the 1930s, Senator Sanders’ program is designed to do more than merely increase economic activity: the expenditure, regulatory, and tax programs will increase economic activity and employment and promote a more just prosperity, “broadly-based” with a narrowing of economic inequality,” says Professor Friedman in his economic analysis.

image

Graph: CBPP

The increase in income concentration since the 1970s reverses the prior, long-term downward trend in concentration, says the non-partisan Center For Budget Policies and Priorities.  “After peaking in 1928, the share of income held by households at the very top of the income ladder declined through the 1930s and 1940s.  Consistent with the shared prosperity found in the Census data on average family income, the share of income received by those at the very top changed little over the 1950s, 1960s, and early 1970s.  The sharp rise in income concentration at the top of the distribution since the late 1970s was interrupted briefly by the dot-com collapse in the early 2000s and again in 2008 with the onset of the financial crisis and deep recession.” 

So Sanders and Friedman have a point—what economic policies will catch US up to those benefits that the citizens of all other developed countries have? In fact, but for the record income and wealth inequality, we could already offer many of those same benefits. We still have the worst income inequality since 1929, the beginning of the Great Depression, and it has not improved since the end of our Great Recession.

Can we blame our young for supporting his vision? It could take more than ten years, as the so-called Reagan trickle-down revolution prevailed for more than 30 years, policies that created the record income inequality by the massive transfer of wealth upward; via the combination of lower tax rates with higher deficit spending that caused major cutbacks in government benefits and programs.

So really, the outcome of Bernie’s economic vision is very dependent on the “broad-based” support of his policies by independents voters, as well as Democrats. The Nevada caucus and South Carolina primary should provide that answer.

Harlan Green © 2016

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Posted in Consumers, Economy, Politics, Weekly Financial News | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

2016 Housing Update

The Mortgage Corner

What should happen to U.S. housing in 2016, with interest rates at record lows and a healthy job market? Much will depend on population growth, and in particular the newest largest generation of all—the millennials, or Gen Y’ers, 18 to 35 years old and born somewhere between 1980 to 2000, say most demographers. They are finally beginning to move out of their parents’ homes—50 percent of them at last count.

image

Graph: CoreLogic

And that is why we are seeing the huge jump in household formation, the main driver of housing growth. A missing ingredient needed to bolster the housing recovery has been a stronger pace of household formation—which is beginning to pick up after eight years of running at low levels, according to CoreLogic Chief Economist Frank Nothaft in the company’s recently released September MarketPulse.

The Great Recession of 2008, with its many job layoffs or employment losses, caused many young adults (and others) to either move in with relatives or share housing with roommates rather than get their own home. As a result, household formation rates fell to their lowest level since the end of World War II.

That trend might be reversing, Nothaft said. In the first half of 2015, the number of new households grew by 1.7 million from the same period in 2014, the largest growth experienced in a decade. Labor market improvements have also played a role in the recent acceleration in household formation, according to Nothaft.

“As the job market has improved, many millennials now have the financial independence to form their own household, and we anticipate that the pent-up desire of young workers to live on their own will sustain household growth of about 1.2 million per year, on average, for several years,” Nothaft said, citing a report from the Joint Center for Housing Studies at Harvard University that forecasted new household growth of between 11 million and 13 million over the next decade depending on the pace of immigration in the United States.

image

The result is that adult millennials, who will total more than their parent baby boomers by 2020, are boosting household formation. And they also ‘own’ the labor force, with more than 53.6 percent of those that are working or looking for work in Q1 2016 and growing, according to PEW Research.

image

Graph: PEW Research

And interest rates are at or below historical levels, especially mortgage rates, which will continue to boost housing growth this year. The 30-year conforming fixed rate has plunged as low as to 3.25 percent in California, with 1.5 originations points, on a given day.

Fed Chairman Janet Yellen is sounding more dovish about the need to raise rates further, as oil prices have plunged, keeping inflation at bay. Yellen reiterated on Wednesday that the Fed expects to have “gradual” interest rate increases. The Fed’s committee meets next in mid-March. But many experts doubt that a March rate hike will happen because other central banks are moving in the opposite direction.

For instance, Japan’s central bank recently introduced negative interest rates, China’s central bank has spent hundreds of billions to prop up its currency and the European Central Bank could soon increase its stimulus program.

Harlan Green © 2016

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Posted in Consumers, Economy, housing market, Weekly Financial News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Candidates Economic Promises Versus Pronouncements

Financial FAQs

Who should we believe of the leading candidates remaining in the Presidential primaries that last through June? Bernie says he will tax the wealthiest enough to pay for his programs, such as free public college tuition and universal health care. But that means raising middle class taxes, as well.

The Donald says he is such a successful businessman that he will negotiate us out of all our problems. But how much can he be believed with four bankruptcies and three marriages already?

Polls show that economic issues top the voters’ concerns, so we should look at the how they will solve those issues. Bernie believes he will save citizens money by converting to universal health care, because if everyone’s covered, the government will have the clout to negotiate down drug and hospital costs.

Though Trump says he won’t touch social security and Medicare, he would cut taxes for the wealthiest further, which will only increase the budget deficit. That’s because trickle-down economics doesn’t work (i.e., more tax breaks for the wealthiest), as evidenced by GW Bush’s two recessions and 8 million jobs lost during his 8 years.

So Mr. Trump is trying to convince us that he is the better negotiator than President Obama, who has managed to pass so many progressive programs (like Obamacare) that conservatives say they feel betrayed. His most hollow pronouncement is the Wall to keep out Hispanic immigrantss, when as many enter through Florida and New York, not to speak of California, and maybe Canada? So he would have to build a wall that surrounds all of US!

Today’s economy is experiencing both record income inequality, since the wages and salaries of 80 percent of our workforce have barely risen above inflation for the past 30 years, and our degraded infrastructure. And let us not forget Flint, but also the many other municipalities with drinking water problems.

image

Senator Bernie says we are the only developed country without universal healthcare and tuition free higher education. Denmark is his oft-repeated example, but they pay for it with a maximum tax rate of 60 percent. Well, America had a maximum tax rate of 92 percent during President Eisenhower’s reign, which enabled US to build our freeway system, land on the moon, create the Internet, and we still had a 4 percent plus growth rate during that time.

So can Bernie’s promises be paid for? We would have to reverse a trend of lower taxes begun in the 1970s. That means bringing out new voters—mostly young—that have been sitting on the sidelines until now. The New Hampshire primary results show that the new voter turnout was HUGE, in Bernie’s words. But as Rachel Maddow pointed out on MSNBC, they were mostly Republicans.

His test will come with the upcoming Nevada caucus and South Carolina primary, with their much more diverse ethnicities. The economic issues being debated this election year are really between facts and fiction—whether economic facts can trump political ideologies. That’s the bottom line. We, the United States of America can’t grow and thrive without our citizens having the benefits of every other developed country, and many undeveloped ones.

Those benefits may seem expensive, as in the Nordic countries, but the drag to economic growth from neglecting these issues is even more expensive—with the ongoing poor health outcomes, a crumbling infrastructure, and unprotected environment.

Harlan Green © 2016

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Posted in Economy, Macro Economics, Politics, Weekly Financial News | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Job Openings and Hires At Record Levels

Popular Economics Weekly

Job openings rose 5 percent to 5.6 million in December, the Labor Department said Tuesday. So why are the financial markets worrying about a looming recession? That reading was the second-highest ever recorded, behind only July 2015, when it touched 5.7 million. Hires rose to 5.36 million from 5.25 million. That’s not just good news for job holders—it also shows that employers and job seekers are finding each other.

image

Graph: Calculated Risk

The above graph shows job openings (yellow line), hires (dark blue), Layoff, Discharges and other (red column), and Quits (light blue column) from the Labor Department’s JOLTS report. Voluntary quits also surged, rising 7 percent to 3.1 million, a sign of worker confidence. Quits are generally voluntary separations initiated by the employee. Therefore, the quits rate can serve as a measure of workers’ willingness or ability to leave jobs. … There were 3.1 million quits in December, up from November. This is even higher than in December 2007 (2.8 million), the first month of the recession, says Calculated Risk

Nobelist Paul Krugman has said it has taken this long for the hire rate to catch up to job openings because of the lack of overall, or aggregate demand, rather than structural factors. (That is, the lack of workers with certain skills.) In other words, wages haven’t been spiking in certain job categories, but have been low in all job categories.

“You see, when the Great Recession struck — a demand-side shock if ever there was one — it took no time at all for a strange consensus to develop in elite opinion, to the effect that a large part of the rise in unemployment was “structural,” and could not be reversed simply by a recovery in demand. Workers just didn’t have the right skills, you see. Many of us argued at length that this was foolish. If skills were the problem, where were the occupations with rapidly rising wages? I pointed out that people said the same thing during the Great Depression, only to see it disproved when we finally got a big fiscal stimulus called World War II.”

And even the problem of low wages may be disappearing. The January unemployment report showed consumer incomes rising faster. Though nonfarm payrolls rose just 151,000 in January, it was enough to push the unemployment down to 4.9 percent and average hourly earnings up 0.5 percent.

image

Graph: Econoday

The 0.5 percent monthly spike in average hourly earnings may largely be due to rises in the minimum wage that are beginning to take effect, say the pundits. Hooray! This is the second strongest gain of the whole cycle, back to 2008, and means a large portion of the lowest-paid workers will finally see an improvement in their living standards.

So will the financial markets come to the realization that our economy doesn’t depend on high oil prices, as alternative energy sources such as wind and solar power begin to take over? Those falling oil prices mean consumers have more to spend on such as autos, and yes, housing. The good news is with residential housing where construction spending rose a very strong 0.9 percent on the month led once again by multi-family units. But single-family units have also been strong, up a year-on-year 8.7 percent.

And interest rates are back to record lows, including mortgage rates, which will also boost consumer spending, and keep us out any recession. In fact, this is the first time since former Fed Chairman Bernanke’s the introduction of QE3 that the conforming 30-year fixed mortgage rate has dipped as low as 3.25 percent.

Harlan Green © 2016

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Posted in Consumers, Economy, Housing, housing market, Weekly Financial News | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment