Housing Recession Over?

Posted on January 19, 2024 by Popular Economics Weekly

The Mortgage Corner

Is the housing recession over? The conforming 30-year fixed rate dropped to 6.60 percent this week, according to Freddie Mac. The fixed 30-year mortgage rate rose to its maximum 7.8 percent in October 2023 before gradually descending to the current rate.

FRED30yearfixed

It had reached this height largely because bond traders had bought the Fed’s story that inflation was still out of control and would take years to return to more normal levels.

This has not been the case. Bond markets are belatedly discovering that inflation has subsided much more quickly, so that it is already close to the Fed’s 2 percent target rate. Even New York Fed President Waller has said the balance between the Fed’s twin mandates of maximum employment with stable prices is “just about right”.

This will bring down mortgage rates even further. The main effect of declining interest rates will be to benefit the housing market that is faced with a severe shortage. This year may see a full-blown housing recovery after a false start in 2020 during the COVID pandemic when fixed mortgage rates briefly dipped to 3 percent.

NAR’s chief economist Lawrence Yun had even announced the housing recession was over last year.

Yun said at the time, “The recovery has not taken place, but the housing recession is over. The presence of multiple offers implies that housing demand is not being satisfied due to lack of supply. Homebuilders are ramping up production and hiring workers.”

Yun was perhaps making a rash prediction because pending home sales at the time, an indicator of homes in escrow but not closed, had risen for the first time in 4 months.

Home sales are continuing to rise ever so slowly this year, and single-family starts that power the housing market have been increasing since January 2023 per Calculated Risk’s graph.

So I believe this year will be the beginning of a real housing recovery, and perhaps signal that overall economic growth will remain strong, since a housing recovery has signaled such in the past.

Calculated Risk

Privately‐owned housing starts in December were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1,460,000. This is 4.3 percent below the revised November estimate of 1,525,000, but is 7.6 percent above the December 2022 rate of 1,357,000, said the US Census Buteau.

Single-family starts increased 15.8% on a year-on-year basis. Permits for future construction of single-family homes increased 1.7% to a pace of 994,000 units last month, the highest level since May 2022. 

Another reason the housing recession may be over. Consumers are becoming more upbeat with the University of Michigan’s consumer sentiment survey jumping a record 13 percent.

“Consumer sentiment soared 13% in January to reach its highest level since July 2021, showing that the sharp increase in December was no fluke,” said survey Director Joanne Hsu. “Consumer views were supported by confidence that inflation has turned a corner and strengthening income expectations. Over the last two months, sentiment has climbed a cumulative 29%, the largest two-month increase since 1991 as a recession ended.” (my emphasis)

It looks like consumers and homebuyers won’t wait longer for this recovery to begin.

Harlan Green © 2024

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Posted in Consumers, COVID-19, Economy, Housing, housing market, Weekly Financial News | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

No Recession At All?

Posted on January 17, 2024 by Popular Economics Weekly

Popular Economics Weekly

Ho hum, another good economic number. December retail sales are telling us why we have avoided a recession this year. It’s because consumers have increased rather than reduced their spending ways.

Sales at retailers jumped +0.6 percent in December, 4.8 percent annually, to cap off a very good holiday shopping season and underscore the resilience of the U.S. economy in 2023. November sales had risen +0.3 percent, 3 percent annually.

How is that possible with Fed officials still refusing to say exactly when they will even begin to cut rates this year? Retail sales aren’t adjusted for inflation, so it means consumers are able to spend just ahead of inflation, which is running approximately 3 percent annually.

FREDretailtradesales

Why then are consumers still shopping? Americans are fully employed, and average hourly wages are rising faster than inflation (+4.1%). Inflation has been falling particularly sharply over the past 6 months (1.9%-2.5%, depending on which inflation measure we look at).

In fact, the Producer Price Index for wholesale goods (e.g., raw materials) shows that inflation has become deflation (i.e., turned negative) over the past 2 months.

The Conference Board reported spending on motor vehicles and parts rose a huge 1.1% in December from November. Spending at gasoline stations fell 1.3% from the month prior due to further declines in oil prices. Nonstore retail sales rose a very large 1.5% from the month prior while spending at department store rose 3.0%, which tells us how much brick-and-mortar retail sales have declined.

I reported earlier consumer confidence had also improved, another indication that consumers don’t see a danger ahead for their pocketbooks. The Conference Board’s confidence index was up 10 points in December.

“December’s increase in consumer confidence reflected more positive ratings of current business conditions and job availability, as well as less pessimistic views of business, labor market, and personal income prospects over the next six months,” said Dana Peterson, Chief Economist at The Conference Board.

AtlantaFed

And we now have the Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow model bumping up Q4 GDP growth to 2.4 percent once more, from 2.2 percent due to “fourth-quarter real personal consumption expenditures growth and fourth-quarter real gross private domestic investment growth.”

This shows how much consumer spending and retail sales are driving economic growth.

The Federal Reserve’s survey of anecdotal evidence for November, known as the Beige Book, said the economy has softened since the previous report at the end of summer, which covers the period of Oct. 6 to Nov. 17.

This could mean the odds have improved for the Fed to begin to drop interest rates sooner, maybe in the spring. It would almost guarantee healthy economic growth this year. And wouldn’t consumers like that!

 Harlan Green © 2023

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Posted in Consumers, COVID-19, Economy, Macro Economics, Weekly Financial News | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Why the Irrational Pessimism–Part II

Posted on January 16, 2024 by Popular Economics Weekly

Financial FAQs

I said a week ago that public polls seem to be saying one thing, economic facts another. Real Clear Politics’ compendium of 11 opinion polls on whether participants approve or disapprove of President Biden’s handling of the economy show a negative -22.5 percent spread (pro Trump, contra Biden).

But as Paul Krugman pointed out more recently, it’s Republicans driving that narrative, not U.S. adult citizens or Democrats.

Krugman/YouGov

Why? The big difference is that Republicans feel much worse for a number of reasons and that can skew the results.

Krugman cited a YouGov survey showing that overall 33% of U.S. adult citizens felt great-to-good personally about 2023 while 27% felt bad-terrible about 2023 for the country—pretty balanced.

With Democrats, however, 44% felt great-good while just 16% felt bad-terrible personally, whereas just 29% of Republicans felt great-good vs. 31% felt bad-terrible. You can begin to see the trend.

But there’s a bigger difference over how constituents felt overall about the country in 2023. Democrats felt much better about 2023—35% to 6% for Republicans, while a whopping 76 percent of Republicans thought 2023 was a bad or terrible year for the country, vs. 35 % of Democrats.

What does that tell us? Mainly that the two parties must get their information from different sources, which speaks to either the fact that the economic benefits of record low unemployment and economic growth in 2023 haven’t filtered down to the red states where Republicans dominate, or a willful ignorance about the facts.

It goes back to Nobel Laureate Robert Shiller’s thesis in his book, Irrational Exuberance; that most economic decisions are formed not by researching the facts but hearsay, word-of-mouth stories, or lazy thinking—i.e., not thinking through the hard news but following the stories that make them feel comfortable.

But it also heavily weights surveys such as Real Clear towards the dominant results—in this case the 76 percent of Republicans who believe 2023 was a terrible year.

Or, perhaps the negative opinions of Republicans about the economy have nothing to do with the economy or their personal well-being.

Maybe it has to do with deep-seated prejudices such as an inherent belief that new immigrants don’t benefit them; or females shouldn’t be allowed to control their own health, a very skewed belief system that babies lives take precedence over their mothers’?

It also calls into question what was once our storied educational system. We were the first country to institute universal K-12 education. But now our K-12 system ranks at the bottom of developed countries in the latest surveys.

Some red states are also banning books from school curriculums and libraries, even persecuting librarians and K-12 teachers for advocating them. Is our public K-12 educational system no longer adequate to maintain a Democracy?

Harlan Green © 2024

Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Posted in Consumers, COVID-19, Economy, Macro Economics, Politics, Weekly Financial News | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

First Signs of Deflation Appearing

Posted on January 13, 2024 by Popular Economics Weekly

The Mortgage Corner

Today’s Producer Price Index for Final Demand, a measure of the cost of wholesale prices, provides the first concrete evidence that we may be entering a period of deflation this New Year.

And, perhaps require the Fed to begin to lower interest rates as soon as in March. Though ongoing wars may cause future shortages but that isn’t happening at present.

Why? Raw material costs are declining into deflation territory, a sign of overproduction, which means prices that consumers must pay for the finished product or service will possibly decline into negative territory as well—when the excess profit margins of distributors and retail sellers that took advantage of the pandemic shortages also subsides.

Overproduction last happened in the 2007-09 Great Recession, as I’ve said, and began a period of Quantitative Easing requiring the Fed to buy massive amounts of securities to increase liquidity enough to boost the inflation rate back to the 2 percent range.

Wholesale prices this round first went into negative territory in July 2022 (-0.28%) per the FRED PPI graph, then fluctuated wildly for several months as supply chains recovered. But the PPI has been negative for the past 3 months, which is a sign that most supply chains have more than recovered.

FREDppi

The danger of overproduction has happened many times in the past and been a major cause of recessions. The Great Recession was caused by the overproduction of housing, for example; some one million excess units.

We saw signs of this in yesterday’s Consumer Price Index as well, when the so-called core index without food and energy prices declined to 3.9 percent for the first time since May 2021, mainly due to lower energy, healthcare, and used car prices.

Energy prices are declining because non-OPEC countries are now outproducing OPEC oil producing countries, for starters, and food prices have softened. The food category was up 2.7% year-over-year, with food away from home up 5.2% during the month and food at home up just 1.3%.

The FAO Food Price Index, which tracks monthly changes in the international prices of commonly traded food commodities, was 13.7% lower last year than the 2022 average, but measures of sugar and rice prices growing in that time.

The pace of inflation for food at home has now been below the Federal Reserve’s overall target rate of 2 percent for three straight months, although the overall level of food prices is still elevated compared to two and three years ago.

Another reason for the deflation concern is consumers usually cut back their spending in the spring. The holiday spending spree is over, and tax season is approaching, which makes personal savings a priority.

In fact, we are already in the Fed’s 2 percent target range. The Personal Consumption Expenditure Price (PCE) Index is already at 1.9% and Core CPI Prices at 2.0% over the past 6 months.

What Fed officials seldom admit is the 2 percent inflation target isn’t a reliable target because there is no accurate measure of inflation as economists such as former Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke have admitted.

Overproduction can become a serious problem as it was during the Great Recession, but the possibility of supply disruptions because of the ongoing Ukraine and Middle East conflicts have made financial analysts leery of even mentioning the possibility of deflation.

The possibility of deflation scared the Fed enough under former Chairman Ben Bernanke to cut the Fed Funds rate to zero percent for a prolonged period—from December 2008 to February 2016.

Can that happen again if the Fed doesn’t begin to lower interest rates sooner?

Harlan Green © 2024

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Posted in Consumers, COVID-19, Economy, Macro Economics, Weekly Financial News | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Please Get Inflation Picture Right!

Posted on January 11, 2024 by Popular Economics Weekly

Financial FAQs

Today’s news that the Consumer Price Index (CPI) was “slightly hotter than expected”, per the Wall Street Journal, caused financial markets to plunge on the assumption the Fed will reduce interest rates more slowly than markets would like to reach its 2 percent inflation target rate.

FREDcpi

Yet if we look at past history in the above FRED cpi graph dating from 1950, the only time the Fed reached its target rate of 2 percent inflation for any length of time was right after WWII into the 1960s, and after the Great Recession of 2007-2009!

So, what does that tell us about monetary policy that is the Feds playing field? It has taken great recessions or WWII (i.e., widest gray bars in graph) to bring down inflation to the Fed’s 2 percent target.

Wow, can acceptable inflation levels only be achieved via recessions? That’s a terrible way to control inflation, in my opinion.

In fact, after 1980 and the Paul Volcker Fed era of sky-high interest rates, the US economy grew very well while averaging 2.5 to 5 percent inflation, until December of 2007 and the start of the Great Recession, which was worldwide let us not forget.

We even had four years of budget surpluses from 1996 to 2000 during the Clinton administration, and the longest period of prosperity (10 years) without a recession.

Yet a few Fed Governors are proving reluctant to accept the fact that inflation is in a prolonged down swing, when today’s ‘slightly hotter’ CPI was almost solely due to sticky used car prices and rental rates.

The above  official BLS graph explains the ingredients of CPI inflation best. The biggest inflation drop was energy (black bar), along with food (blue bar), though its Core index (green bar) was above the All Items index.

“In December, the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers increased 0.3 percent, seasonally adjusted, and rose 3.4 percent over the last 12 months, not seasonally adjusted.”

What is the real cause of the inflationary surge? Most economists now say it was suddenly interrupted supply-chains caused by the pandemic that returned to normal, thus increasing the supply of things and services, not excessive demand because of suddenly wealthy consumer spending too much due to all the pandemic recovery aid.

Economics Professor James Galbraith, son of New Deal Economist John Kenneth Galbraith said, “There is a wave of reporting to the effect that the Fed deserves credit [for the drop in inflation]. But the fact is that the peak in rising prices occurred in June 2022, and that was only three months after the Fed started raising interest rates.”

Average hourly private sector wages are the main driver of demand-side inflation (via consumer spending) and they peaked in March 2022 at 5.9 percent. Average earnings had already dropped to 5.4 percent in June 2022, continuing their decline to 4.1 percent in December 2023.

So why do Fed Governors keep saying that the unemployment rate must rise to lower inflation? New York Federal Reserve President John Williams, one of the most influential Governors, was cited recently at a White Plains, NY speech per MarketWatch saying U.S. interest rates will likely need to stay high “for some time” until senior central bank officials are confident the rate of inflation is returning to 2 percent. He said the labor market would need to soften a bit more, potentially bumping up the unemployment rate to 4 percent from the current level of 3.7 percent.

We have had the unemployment rate below 4 percent for two years, current 6-month inflation is hovering at 2.5 percent and still declining, and consumers continue in record numbers to travel and enjoy leisure activities, I said recently.

Why spoil the party unnecessarily with another recession?

Harlan Green © 2024

Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Posted in Consumers, COVID-19, Economy, Macro Economics, Weekly Financial News | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

When Has Inflation Declined This Quickly?

Posted on January 9, 2024 by Popular Economics Weekly

The Mortgage Corner

When was the last time inflation rates declined this steeply? You guessed right if you said the Great Recession.

Calculated Risk’s colorful graph of various inflation indicators (gray bars are recessions) shows the history of Core CPI (red line) and Core PCE (green line) inflation from January 1990, among others. Core prices are without more volatile food and energy prices.

What does that tell us about the current drop in inflation? Maybe there’s a danger of it falling too far, too fast, fulfilling the prophecies of some that still see a looming recession. This inflation surge was worse than during the Great Recession (thickest blue bar) because of the COVID pandemic, per the graphic picture.

Calculated Risk Blog

Only the 1980-81 recessions caused a sharper inflation decline. But that was because then Fed Chair Paul Volcker raised interest rates into the double digits to combat double-digit inflation caused by the 1970’s oil crisis-fed stagflationary spiral.

In fact, we are already in the Fed’s 2 percent target range. The Personal Consumption Expenditure Price (PCE) Index is already at 1.9% and Core CPI Prices at 2.0% over the past 6 months.

And what Fed officials seldom admit is the 2 percent inflation target isn’t a dependable target. Why? Because no one really knows what the true inflation rate is! Yes, there is no measure among the vari-colored measures above that is an accurate indicator of inflation as economists such as former Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke have admitted. It could have already hit zero percent in some sectors of our economy. Hence economists consult many different indexes to arrive at a mean value.

And consumers may already believe this, since the most recent inflation assessment coming from the New York Fed says their expectations are declining fast as well.

Consumers expect the inflation rate to fall to 3 percent, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. That’s the lowest anticipated one-year ahead inflation rate since January 2021, in the NY Fed’s ongoing survey of consumer expectations.

Median inflation expectations declined at all horizons, falling to 3.0 percent from 3.4 percent at the one-year ahead horizon, to 2.6 percent from 3.0 percent at the three-year ahead horizon, and to 2.5 percent from 2.7 percent at the five-year ahead horizon. 

Maybe some Fed Governors, such as Michele Bowman are beginning to believe this as well who have studied the history of inflation.

Energy and food prices are falling, for starters. The U.S. is even outproducing the OPEC countries and Russia, which may not be the best way to win the inflation war. But it could convince the Fed to begin to lower short term rates sooner and preserve this recovery.

No one really wants to cause another recession, right?.

Harlan Green © 2024

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Posted in Consumers, COVID-19, Weekly Financial News | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Still Fully Employed!

Posted on January 5, 2024 by Popular Economics Weekly

Popular Economics Weekly

Ho hum. The U.S. economy was still fully employed in December. How boring! The St. Louis Fed (FRED) graph below shows the American economy has been at full employment since December 2021 when the unemployment rate first sank below 4 percent (to 3.9 percent).

And much of the hiring has been at state and local government levels because local governments are finally recovering from the COVID pandemic. That is the surest indicator of the beginning of a new uptick in the business cycle.

FREDunemployment

“Total nonfarm payroll employment increased by 216,000 in December, and the unemployment rate was unchanged at 3.7 percent, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Employment continued to trend up in government, health care, social assistance, and construction, while transportation and warehousing lost jobs.”

Average hourly wages of nonfarm private employees rose from 4.0 to 4.1 percent annually.

More good news is that factory orders have picked up, according to the Commerce Department, with new orders for U.S.-made goods increasing more than expected in November amid a surge in demand for civilian aircraft, government data showed on Friday.

Factory orders rose 2.6 percent after declining by 3.4 percent in October, the Commerce Department’s Census Bureau said. Orders climbed 0.7 percent on a year-on-year basis in November. And manufacturing, which accounts for 10.3 percent of the economy, is still being constrained by high interest rates. It should therefore pick up even more this year as interest rates decline further.

This is what is called a ‘soft landing’, I said when the unemployment rate dropped back to 3.7 percent in November. Government agencies at all levels added 52,000 new jobs in December – the biggest of any industry – to cap off a record year of hiring (i.e., total of 2.7 million new jobs in 2023), says MarketWatch’s Jeffry Bartash. “Altogether, government employment rose by 672,000 in 2023 and accounted for one-quarter of all new U.S. jobs created.”

So, what’s not to like about this jobs report? Maybe the Fed may now change its mind and not bring down interest rates so quickly, which could happen beginning this March? The evidence is becoming overwhelming that inflation is continuing to rapidly fall. Maybe Powell, et. al., may begin to worry that prices could plunge even more, which isn’t a good sign, since profits then begin to decline, a precursor to a recession.

I believe all the government hiring shows something else—a full blown recovery leading to a new business cycle and maybe what I’ve been calling a ‘Roaring Twenty-Twenties’. Such a ‘roaring’ recovery happened once before, a century ago at the end of the last pandemic that was caused by the Spanish Flu.

Then again, maybe a more boring economic recovery is in the works, with steady employment, wages continuing to rise more than inflation, and a majority of consumers admitting they are happy. Maybe a boring economy is good!

Harlan Green © 2024

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Posted in Consumers, COVID-19, Economy, Macro Economics, Weekly Financial News | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Q4 Growth Prospects Improve

Posted on January 4, 2024 by Popular Economics Weekly

The Mortgage Corner

Prospects for better fourth quarter economic growth are improving. Why? Interest rates are declining along with inflation rates.

The Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow Q4 estimate of economic growth that I like just picked up steam after several downward revisions.

AtlantaFed

“The GDPNow model estimate for real GDP growth (seasonally adjusted annual rate) in the fourth quarter of 2023 is 2.5 percent on January 3, up from 2.0 percent on January 2. After this morning’s release of the ISM Manufacturing Index from the Institute for Supply Management, the nowcasts of fourth-quarter gross personal consumption expenditures growth and fourth-quarter gross private domestic investment growth increased from 2.4 percent and -0.4 percent, respectively, to 2.9 percent and 0.5 percent,” said its report.”

In fact, I mentioned last week that the rate of U.S. inflation based on the Federal Reserve’s preferred PCE index became negative in November for the first time since 2020 indicating that price pressures continue to subside. The PCE index actually dipped – 0.1 percent last month, the government said Friday, and was unchanged in October.

Boosting growth is consumer spending that has held up with robust holiday shopping, and soaring construction spending, up 11.3 percent annually.

FREDconstruction

Why? It’s mostly the Infrastructure and Inflation Reduction Acts pairing with private industry in modernizing the American economy that is creating high-paying jobs and producing more things, which also brings down inflation.

There’s more spending on highways and bridges, while private residential construction rose 1.1 percent in November, with single-family construction up 2.9 percent and multi-family construction rising 0.1 percent. These are longer term investments which should mean longer term growth prospects.

On the inflation front stocks and bonds have been rallying because Chairman Powell sounded dovish for the first time at his December press conference following their last FOMC meeting of the year.

“The question of when it will be appropriate to begin dialing back the policy restraint” was clearly “a discussion for us at our meeting today,” Powell said. The Fed is “likely at or near the peak rate for this cycle.”

Plunging interest rates are best illustrated by the 10-year benchmark fixed rate Treasury note yield that sets mortgage rates. It had dropped below 4 percent for the first time since the pandemic.

And the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage fell for the seventh week in a row, averaging 6.61 percent as of Dec. 28, according to data released by Freddie Mac on Thursday. A year ago, the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage was averaging at 6.31 percent.

What’s not to like about prospects for growth in the New Year? Would congress be so foolish as to close down government because so much is on the line? I don’t think so.

Harlan Green © 2024

Follow Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Posted in Consumers, COVID-19, Economy, Housing, housing market, Keynesian economics, Weekly Financial News | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Why the Irrational Pessimism?

Posted on January 2, 2024 by Popular Economics Weekly

Financial FAQs

Public polls seem to be saying one thing, economic facts another. Real Clear Politics compendium of 11 opinion polls on whether participants approve or disapprove of President Biden’s handling of the economy show a negative -22.5 percent spread.

Yet we have had the unemployment rate below 4 percent for two years, current inflation is hovering at 2.5 percent and still declining, and consumers continue in record numbers to travel and enjoy leisure activities.

FREDunemployment

Household wealth has also increased 37 percent since 2019, per the New York Fed, the minimum wage has risen to the mid-teens in most states (except a few red states), and there is a labor shortage with nine million job vacancies that has resulted in record wage increases in multiple industries.

Why the disconnect between economic reality and public opinions? Could it be poll takers are asking the wrong questions, like are you better off today than during the pandemic?

Most of the respondents say they are personally better off, but the economy isn’t improving. How can that be?

I maintain it is what I call the Irrational Pessimism of investors, which are most Americans that respond to said polls. It is the opposite of what Nobelist Robert Shiller has called Irrational Exuberance, but for the same reasons.

Yale Professor Shiller is one of the founders of behavioral finance and author of many books that won him the Nobel Prize in 2013. His research has said that most people act irrationally when making financial decisions. Such decisions are mainly based on hearsay, rumors, and plain old irrational exuberance.

For example, the housing bubble was caused by the public’s belief that housing prices only rose but never fell since they hadn’t fallen for decades, said Shiller.

Professor Shiller has written about it in successive editions of his book, Irrational Exuberance. And former Fed Chair Greenspan first brought such behavior to the world’s attention before the 2000 Dot-com recession, as I said recently.

So why would not the public behave irrationally having just weathered the worst pandemic in 100 years—that is, being irrationally pessimistic in the face of so much financial trauma?

His research and that of other Neo-Keynesian (those who essentially believe that government is needed to maintain a healthy economy, as happened with FDR’s New Deal) show that most financial decisions aren’t based on the careful search of facts, but mental laziness, even in the housing market.

It has essentially refuted those economists who believed since the 1970s that financial markets behaved rationally—i.e., that investors carefully thought through their financial decisions, hence unregulated, free markets were the surest way to prosperity.

That didn’t prove the case, of course, as the six recessions since 1980, including the Great Recession, have proven.

So, in fact, poll respondents may not be thinking of their own personal well-being in these polls. They tend to act more rationally when the personal stakes are highest.

But understanding complex markets is another matter, and one that takes more time and effort. Perhaps by November and presidential election time rolls around, the American public will take the economic consequences of their decisions more seriously, and not leave it to hearsay, word-of-mouth and irrational pessimism. Let us hope so.

Harlan Green © 2024

Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Posted in Consumers, COVID-19, Economy, Housing, housing market, Keynesian economics, Weekly Financial News | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

No Recession Next Year?

Posted on December 30, 2023 by Popular Economics Weekly

Financial FAQs

Fortune Magazine has come up with the most interesting reasons for a looming recession in a recent edition.

“Here are six reasons why a recession remains Bloomberg Economics’ base case. They range from the wiring of the human brain and the mechanics of monetary policy, to strikes, higher oil prices and a looming credit squeeze — not to mention the end of Taylor Swift’s concert tour.”

I’m not sure just what the wiring of the human brain has to do with recessions, other than Nobelist Robert Shiller research about human behavior; that most financial decisions are based on hearsay, rumors, and plain old irrational exuberance.

The housing bubble was caused by such behavior. Professor Shiller has written about it in successive editions of his book, Irrational Exuberance. And former Fed Chair Greenspan first brought such behavior to the world’s attention before the 2000 Dot-com recession.

Fortune Magazine should add blockbuster movies like Barbie and Oppenheimer, if they want to attribute our current economic health to happy consumers enjoying leisure activities; but their current temperament could change with bad news.

Oil prices are falling, the strikes have been settled with employees winning bigtime with better benefits, and the current credit squeeze hasn’t hurt current record employment and consumer spending to date per below graph (gray bars are recessions).

FREDunemployment

Federal Reserve Governors have also been sounding more dovish on interest rate policy of late.

“The question of when it will be appropriate to begin dialing back the policy restraint” was clearly “a discussion for us at our meeting today,” Powell said at his last press conference of this year. The Fed is “likely at or near the peak rate for this cycle.”

That leaves what Bloomberg believes is the major determinant of a possible recession; the “looming credit squeeze” due to the continuation of higher inflation and interest rates. So, we don’t yet know the full effect of the sudden hike in interest rates engineered by the Fed since March 2022, some 18 months ago that has made borrowing more expensive.

But consumers seem to act rationally when it affects their pocketbooks, especially from too high prices and interest rates. Their record spending on leisure activities could change if the Fed doesn’t begin to lower interest rates in the spring, as I said.

The so-called Fed Funds rate has been at its high point of 5.25 to 5.50 percent from August 2023, just five months, whereas Greenspan’s Fed held rates at their maximum for eight months, from August 2006 to June 2007. The Great Recession was determined to have begun in December 2007.

So there isn’t much room left to avoid a recession, is there? Watch the actual behavior of interest rates to know what consumers will do next!

Harlan Green © 2023

Harlan Green on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarlanGreen

Posted in Consumers, COVID-19, Economy, Weekly Financial News | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment