Consumers Regaining Financial Health

Posted on December 16, 2011 by Popular Economics Weekly

Popular Economics Weekly

Consumers are spending for the holidays. Retail sales in particular have rebounded to almost pre-recession levels. Overall retail sales in November grew 0.2 percent, following a 0.6 percent boost in October (originally up 0.5 percent) and a 1.3 percent spike in September (previously up 1.1 percent). Retail sales in November rose 6.7 percent annually, compared to 7.5 percent in October. Excluding motor vehicles, sales were up 6.6 percent on a year-on-year basis, compared to 7.5 percent the month before.

clip_image002

Graph: Inside Debt

So once again, as with jobs, the numbers were higher than initially reported. Overall components were largely favorable. The strongest component was for electronics & appliance stores which jumped 2.1 percent in November, followed by nonstore retailers (up 1.5 percent) and auto dealers (up 0.5 percent). Also seeing gains were furniture & home furnishing, clothing & accessory stores, sporting goods & hobby, and general merchandise.

The Labor Department’s Job Openings, Layoffs, and Turnover Survey (JOLTS) report also looked good, with 3.27 million job openings. Although the number of job openings remained below the 4.4 million openings when the recession began in December 2007, the level in October was 1.2million higher than in July 2009 (the most recent trough for the series). The number of job openings has increased 35 percent since the end of the recession in June 2009.

clip_image004

Graph: Wrightson ICAP

But will consumer spending hold up in 2012? Since consumer confidence is rising from the mid-year pessimism of congressional gridlock, Japanese Tsunami, and S&P credit downgrade, it looks like that will happen—in part because real incomes are rising again with declining inflation. Consumer spending has in fact been increasing 7 percent annually since March 2010.

It is particularly hard to understand why we are still in a disinflationary environment, when energy and food prices fluctuate so much. The largest factor is almost no increase in labor costs. This is because wages and salaries—which make up 80 percent of personal incomes and two-thirds of product costs—are barely rising, while housing prices are still falling. And corporations are hoarding some $2 trillion in cash, banks have $1.8 trillion in excess reserves they are not spending or lending. With so little money in circulation—whether from wage earners or corporate spenders—then prices cannot rise appreciably.

clip_image006

Payroll jobs in November advanced a relatively strong 120,000 after gaining a revised 100,000 in October (originally 80,000) and increased a revised 210,000 in September (previously 158,000).  So look for upward revisions once again.  Private payrolls (less government layoffs) gained more than overall, up140,000, following a 117,000 increase in October and 220,000 rise in September.

The stronger employment numbers are corroborated by weekly initial claims for unemployment insurance. Back to back declines of 19,000 in initial jobless claims are signaling sudden strength in the labor market. Claims in the December 10 week came in at 366,000, far below expectations for 390,000 and compared to 385,000 in the prior week (revised 4,000 higher). The 366,000 level is the lowest since May 2008. The four-week average is down 6,500 to 387,750 for the lowest level since July 2008. The average, in a convincing sign of strength, has been down in 10 of the last 12 weeks, said Econoday.

clip_image008

That is the main reason economists are revising growth estimates upward to 3 percent plus in 2012. Consumers are spending—and borrowing again.

Harlan Green © 2011

Posted in Consumers, Economy, Weekly Financial News | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

2011—The Year That Wasn’t

Posted on December 11, 2011 by Popular Economics Weekly

Popular Economics Weekly

What do we make of this year’s economy, with its ups and downs that have confused even the ‘experts’; and what to make of 2012? Believe it or not, the congressional gridlock that caused the S&P Treasury debt downgrade may actually boost growth. Because the Bush-era tax cuts are scheduled to expire end of 2012, which would put them back to the Clinton-era tax brackets. And we know what happened during Clinton’s Presidency—22.7 million jobs created, and 4 consecutive years of budget surpluses were paid for with the combination of higher income tax brackets and reduced government spending.

Firstly, we should understand that the experts overestimated economic growth at the beginning of 2011, then underestimated it by midyear—which means that we were never in danger of a second recession. The best example is our unemployment numbers. From June onward, both private payrolls and the self-employed have been increasing at more than 200,000 per month, which is close to pre-recession levels.

The household survey component of the jobs report including the self-employed – an actual headcount of working Americans – has shown a gain of 1.28 million over the past four months alone, whereas initial payroll formation showed zero or almost zero job growth in August-September before it was upgraded. And that—with the S&P credit downgrade and euro worries—is what set off new recession talk.

clip_image002

Payroll jobs in November advanced a relatively strong 120,000 after gaining a revised 100,000 in October (originally 80,000) and increased a revised 210,000 in September (previously 158,000).  So look for upward revisions once again.  Revisions for September and October were up net 72,000. Once again, private payrolls (less government layoffs) gained more than overall.  Private nonfarm payrolls gained 140,000, following a 117,000 increase in October and 220,000 rise in September.

clip_image004

Then we had the so-called congressional Supercommittee not being super at all. They couldn’t agree on what budgets to cut, or revenues to raise. But as Paul Krugman has said, that may be a good thing—

“The supercommittee was a superdud — and we should be glad. Nonetheless, at some point we’ll have to rein in budget deficits. And when we do, here’s a thought: How about making increased revenue an important part of the deal?”

In fact, such a budget deficit during the worst recession since the Great Depression is necessary to fund vital public services and keep the economy running, until private business begins to invest again. And that won’t happen until consumer spending picks up, as we have said in past columns. The deficit will improve as the economy continues to grow, in other words, but won’t pick up if more jobs are cut—whether from the private or public sectors.

Consumer spending has barely held up during the various crises. It is best measured by consumer credit. Strength in consumer spending is confirmed by a build in outstanding consumer credit, up $7.6 billion in October following a revised $6.9 billion increase in September. The increase is once again centered in non-revolving credit, which reflects strength in vehicle sales. But a steady increase is now appearing for non-revolving credit, up $0.4 billion for a second consecutive month and offering evidence that consumers are once again, at least to a limited extent, using their credit cards.

clip_image006

That means it is real estate that is still holding up a stronger recovery. Despite headwinds, the latest pending home sales report indicates that housing may be back on a modest uptrend—at least for sales, according to Econoday. Low prices and low interest rates appear to be creating traction as the pending home index, which is a measure of contract signings for sales of existing homes, jumped 10.4 percent in October, following a 4.6 percent decline the prior month.

clip_image008

But the real measure of housing health is existing-home sales, which have been stuck in the 5million range since 2008, due to the large number of foreclosures and distressed sales.

clip_image010

Housing prices are just now beginning to recover from a more than 30 percent plunge, as measured by the Case-Shiller Home Price Index. Housing construction is also showing some strength for the first time since 2009, which will add to GDP growth. Why? Household formation is picking up, as the so-called echo boomers—children of baby boomers—finally begin to leave their parents’ home. Household formation should double this year to 1 million from last year’s 500,000.

That is probably why construction spending in October advanced 0.8 percent after rising an unrevised 0.2 percent in September. The October increase was led by a 3.4 percent boost in private residential outlays, following a 0.6 percent rise in September.  Construction outlays have risen three months in a row and in six of the last seven months.  The level of activity is still subdued but it now appears to be growing and adding to overall economic growth, as we have said.  It is not an “engine” like manufacturing but it is in better shape than even less than a year ago.

clip_image012

The latest report from the Institute for Supply Management also added to growth estimates as the manufacturing sector is regaining momentum.  The ISM manufacturing index moved further into positive territory, rising 1.2 points in November to a reading of 52.7. The gain in the index was led by a 6.5 point jump in the production index to 56.6.  Importantly, the new orders index was up a very strong 4.3 points to 56.7, above 50 to indicate monthly growth and pointing to continuing momentum.

clip_image014

Lastly, Gross Domestic Product estimates, the best measure of overall growth, are being revised upward to 3 percent plus next year by economists, after the mid-year scare. So this also means more job creation if those forecasts are fulfilled.

clip_image016

Graph: Calculated Risk

The bottom line is that many difficulties lie ahead, but it doesn’t look like congressional gridlock can do much more to limit growth. In fact, if the Bush tax cuts of 2001, 2003, and 2006 were extended past 2012, it would increase the deficit by $3.7 trillion over the next decade, according to CNN. Whereas letting the cuts expire on December 31, 2012 would reduce the federal deficit by 40 percent over just the next five years.

So, if both progressives and conservatives would step out of their idelogical strait jackets, they would see that government doing nothing at the moment might be the best road to a recovery. One caveat—Wall Street can’t be allowed to again do business as usual. They are still lobbying ferociously to weaken regulation of derivatives’ trading under Dodd-Frank, which will also reveal just how much risk they are still taking with Other People’s Money—i.e., their investors. Until such reporting requirements are made law, over-the-counter derivatives’ trading, which totals some $600 trillion, according to the New York Times, will continue to endanger our overall economy.

Harlan Green © 2011

Posted in Economy, Macro Economics, Weekly Financial News | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Austerity (That) Doesn’t Work

Posted on December 3, 2011 by Popular Economics Weekly

Financial FAQs

It turns out that austerity doesn’t work, when it means tax cuts for the wealthy but spending (and so income) cuts for the rest of US. But austerity does work when applied to the wealthiest who have used their wealth to create more instability, rather than creating jobs.

Great Britain is the best current example. The austerity budget cuts of its ruling Conservative Party have brought economic growth to a halt, whereas U.S. growth is returning to a more normal 3 percent rate because of U.S. government stimulus programs. Britain is much more socialized, yet if it had taxed the wealthiest to support their programs instead of giving them even more tax breaks, it would have paid down debt without taking the earning and spending power away from government workers and unions (a lesson that we have only partially learned). Then such a slowdown would have been averted.

Paul Krugman brings this out in a recent blog, stating that “…what’s happening in Britain now is that depressed estimates of long-run potential are being used to justify more austerity, which will depress the economy even further in the short run, leading to further depression of long-run potential, leading to …It really is just like a medieval doctor bleeding his patient, observing that the patient is getting sicker, not better, and deciding that this calls for even more bleeding.”

Their economic thinking is not quite medieval but certainly from the 18th century, when Adam Smith’s invisible hand theory was first used to rationalize conservatives’ ideology that government is evil. We now know that cutting spending doesn’t lead us out of recessions, or worse. It takes budget deficits during bad times to prime the pumps of private employers, until they loosen their own purse strings and begin to invest the $trillions from record profits that they have instead used to buy back their stock in order to boost CEO incomes.

Most of the economic damage is being done in the government sector, as our own Labor Department’s November employment report shows. The increase in hiring took place entirely in the private sector, with employment rising by 140,000. Governments cut 20,000 jobs last month to put the total loss over the past two years at around 600,000. States and municipalities have been forced to reduce staff to balance their budgets as required by local law.

clip_image002

Graph: Wrightson ICAP

And hiring in October was revised up to 100,000 from 80,000 and the job gains in September were revised up to 210,00 from 158,000, which shows private employers are having to hire more payrolls to keep up with consumers demand during the holidays. So the damage to employment is being done to precisely the workforce targeted by conservatives in England and America—government workers.

The expansion in the Institute for Supply Management’s manufacturing survey also buttressed our stronger growth prospects, which increased in almost all areas. The new orders index for November is up a very strong 4.3 points to 56.7, above 50 to indicate monthly growth and well above October. This index had been stuck at slightly sub-50 levels in prior months which now are forgotten. Helped by new orders, the ISM composite index is up 1.2 points to a 52.7 level that compares with the Econoday consensus for 51.5. November’s level is the best since June.

clip_image004

And it may not be a lot (coming from a low base) but it is starting to look like the construction sector is incrementally adding to overall economic growth. Construction spending in October advanced 0.8 percent after rising an unrevised 0.2 percent in September. Analysts had forecast a 0.3 percent boost for October.

clip_image006

The October increase was led by a 3.4 percent boost in private residential outlays, following a 0.6 percent rise in September. Private nonresidential construction spending also posted a gain, rising 1.3 percent, following a 0.1 percent dip the month before. Once again public outlays declined 1.8 percent after a 0.3 percent increase the prior month, illustrating the damage those pushing for more austerity is doing to economic growth. On a year-ago basis, overall construction outlays improved to down 0.4 percent in October from down 0.6 percent in September.

Construction outlays have risen three months in a row and in six of the last seven months. The level of activity is still subdued but it now appears to be growing and adding to overall economic growth, said Econoday. It is not an “engine” like manufacturing but it is in better shape than even less than a year ago.

So we see the result of austerity policies during recessions. They do not bring on recoveries, period. And that’s why the situation in Europe is so much worse. Krugman’s warnings have been realized: “How did things go so wrong? The answer you hear all the time is that the euro crisis was caused by fiscal irresponsibility. Turn on your TV and you’re very likely to find some pundit declaring that if America doesn’t slash spending we’ll end up like Greece. Greeeeeece!

“But the truth is nearly the opposite. Although Europe’s leaders continue to insist that the problem is too much spending in debtor nations, the real problem is too little spending in Europe as a whole. And their efforts to fix matters by demanding ever harsher austerity have played a major role in making the situation worse.”

The real result of austerity during hard times is really that it falls on necessary public services such as education, police and fire departments, and even environmental regulation. These are the essential services needed by all, rich and poor. Cutting back on those services not only prolongs the slowdown, but deepens it.

Harlan Green © 2011

Posted in Consumers, Economy, Macro Economics, Weekly Financial News | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Elizabeth Warren’s Teach-in

Posted on December 1, 2011 by Popular Economics Weekly

Popular Economics Weekly

What better way to understand Elizabeth Warren’s bid for Massachusetts Senator to replace Scott Brown that conduct a Teach-in, much as the OccupyWallStreeters are doing. She stands for what we all need, after all, more knowledge on how to combat the huge levels of social and economic inequality that have arisen over the past 30 years from a corporate and Wall Street culture that glorified profits over social responsibility, or even honesty.

Professor Warren’s specialty at Harvard is contract and bankruptcy law, after all, so she has seen firsthand the damage that fine print in mortgage contracts and wholesale deregulation of financial oversight can do. A New York Times profile spelled out some of her agenda. “Ms. Warren talks about the nation’s growing income inequality in a way that channels the force of the Occupy Wall Street movement but makes it palatable and understandable to a far wider swath of voters,” said the Times. “She is provocative and assertive in her critique of corporate power and the well-paid lobbyists who protect it in Washington, and eloquent in her defense of an eroding middle class.”

But it’s more than that. She is a teacher, and so teaching the public why the middle and lower classes have lost so much of their wealth is a priority. In fact, their loss of wealth is why economic growth has been slowing historically. Part of it has to do with the massive deregulation of industries begun by President Reagan in his war against government; waged on the promise it would raise everyone’s prosperity level. But the result instead was it took away the income and wealth of ‘everyone’ and gave it to the wealthiest on the thinnest of rationalizations—that they were the real job creators, not the consumers who bought their products.

Does that mean we are helpless victims who have to be protected by Big Government, unable to take care of ourselves? No, in “All Your Worth: The Ultimate Lifetime Money Plan” written with daughter Amelia Tyagi, she spells out her beliefs on individual responsibility. “You can’t count on good old-fashioned hard work the way your parents did. Go to school, get a good job, do your work, don’t go crazy with spending, and everything will work out, right? Not anymore. That advice may have worked in your parents’ day, but today you have to be smart with your money. Not just a little smart, but super smart. You have to learn the new rules — the rules nobody told you and nobody talks about. And you have to learn them fast.”

And that in fact is what her teach-ins are about—learning the new rules, as well as working to change them to be more consumer friendly. What are they? Firstly, a major rule change was abolishing usury laws that have enabled national banks to charge as much as 30 percent on credit card debt. In another bestseller with her daughter, “The Two-Income Trap”, they spell out why the middle class has lost ground. Deregulation has allowed banks to write their own rules, with no concern for their own customers’ welfare.

For instance, the 2005 bankruptcy laws have means testing—only those with below median incomes for their states can file for Chapter 7 Bankruptcy, which abolishes all unsecured debt. So struggling households saddled with catastrophic health care costs (because health care costs aren’t controlled), have to sell everything they own to even file for bankruptcy.

“That puts women trying to collect domestic support obligations and credit card companies in direct competition for the ex-husband’s resources,” said Ms. Tyagi in a 2004 Mother Jones interview. “Credit card companies can hire lawyers and develop extensive debt collect departments, something that is really tough for women. When the credit industry controls the bankruptcy rules, women lose.”

That is the real reason the standard of living of all but the top 1 percent has fallen. And it hurts all of us. Richard Wilkinson has spelled it out in a recent TEDS conference, and his book with Kate Pickett, “The Spirit Level”. Countries and states with the highest income inequality have the highest crime rates, illness outcomes, and most environmental degradation—you name it—as well as least social mobility that would allow greater opportunities to improve themselves.

clip_image002

Graph: TED Conference

Why such a shift from equal opportunity back to an era of Social Darwinism in just 30 years that was capitalism in its earliest form? It is in part due to the huge amount of wealth we have amassed. Former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan has said: “It is not that humans have become any more greedy than in generations past. It is that the avenues to express greed had grown so enormously.”

Wealth generates its own temptations, in other words, and so removing the barriers to its acquisition can overwhelm even common sense when dealing with severe financial crises.

Harlan Green © 2011

Posted in Consumers, Economy, Macro Economics, Weekly Financial News | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Housing Picture is Better Than We Know

Posted on December 1, 2011 by Popular Economics Weekly

The Mortgage Corner

There have been some developments that tell us housing prices could stabilize and new home construction pick up in the New Year. This is even thought the continuing fall in housing prices has stymied any growth prospects, as well as the foreclosure mess that has kept banks from loosening their credit standards enough to encourage more home buying.

For instance, a recent press release from the National Association of Homebuilders said the number of improving housing markets continued to expand for a third consecutive month in November, rising from 23 to 30 on the latest National Association of Home Builders/First American Improving Markets Index (IMI).

And single-family housing starts rose 3.9 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 430,000 units in October, according to the U.S. Commerce Department. This is while single-family permits also posted a measurable gain of 5.1 percent to 434,000 units in the latest report, which is their fastest pace since December of 2010.

clip_image002

Sales of new single-family houses in October 2011 also rose slightly, to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 307,000 … This is 1.3 percent above the revised September rate of 303,000 and is 8.9 percent above the October 2010 estimate of 282,000.

clip_image004

The flood of distressed sales has kept existing home sales elevated, and depressed new home sales since builders can’t compete with the low prices of all the foreclosed properties. And so we still have the ‘distressing gap’ between new and existing-home sales, according to Calculated Risk.

clip_image006

Low prices and low interest rates appear to be creating traction in the housing market with pending home sales the latest report to show strength. The pending home index, which is a measure of contract signings for sales of existing homes, jumped 10.4 percent in October to 93.3, according to the National Association of Realtors. This is after pending home sales index fell 4.6 percent in September with declines split about evenly across regions. September’s decline was unusually steep, following declines of 1.2 percent in August and 1.3 percent in July.

The gain points to strength in final sales of existing homes for November and December though cancellations, tied to low appraisals that keep buyers from selling their own homes and to restrictions to credit access, have been cutting into the proportion of contracts that make it to closing.

Harlan Green © 2011

Posted in Economy, Housing, housing market, Weekly Financial News | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Consumers Feel Better

Posted on November 30, 2011 by Popular Economics Weekly

Popular Economics Weekly

Black Friday, or the day after Thanksgiving, was an eye-opener. Sales jumped 7 percent, a record, and Monday’s cyber-sales followed its lead. How can consumers be spending so much with incomes that aren’t rising as much?

One clue is that consumers have paid down so much debt, while disposable income, as well as wages and salaries, have been growing at 2 percent—not great, but enough to keep things bubbling. In fact, it’s been enough to boost the Conference Board’s consumer confidence survey, at least, about future conditions. For instance, those seeing better job prospects in 6 months increased from 5.8 to 12.9 percent, while the proportion that sees jobs as hard to find dropped from 42.1 to 24.1 percent.

clip_image002

Graph: Inside Debt

Consumer confidence has surged this month, in other words, with improvement centered in employment. The Conference Board’s measure jumped more than 15 points to 56.0 from an upward revised 40.9 in October. November is the best reading since the debt-ceiling debacle and cut of the US credit rating in August.

This is while consumer credit expanded $7.4 billion in September benefiting once again from strength in nonrevolving credit. Nonrevolving credit outstanding, reflecting strong vehicle sales, rose $8.0 billion in the month to $1.66 trillion.

September brings in third quarter data which shows consumer credit expanding at a 1.6 percent annual rate, down from the second-quarter rate of 3.5 percent. Revolving credit during the quarter contracted at a 3.2 percent annual rate, more than reversing the second-quarter rate of plus 1.5 percent, said Econoday.

clip_image004

Another eye-opener was the surge in ADP private payrolls employment. ADP today reported that employment in the U.S. nonfarm private business sector increased by 206,000 from October to November on a seasonally adjusted basis. The estimated advance in employment from September to October was revised up to 130,000 from the initially reported 110,000. The increase in November was the largest monthly gain since last December and nearly twice the average monthly gain since May when employment decelerated sharply.

clip_image006

So, can it be true that consumers’ optimism is well-grounded? The Conference Board’s survey said those saying jobs are currently hard to get fell nearly five percentage points to 42.1 percent. Another key reading is a sharp improvement in income expectations over the next six months with more, 14.9 percent, seeing an increase and fewer, 13.8 percent, seeing a decrease. This is the first time since April that optimists have outnumbered pessimists.

Other positives in today’s report include an improvement in buying plans for both homes and appliances and a three percentage point decline in 12-month inflation expectations to 5.5 percent. It is of course the holiday season when shoppers like to shop, but this could be a turning point. Optimism leads to increased consumer spending, and we know it is consumer spending that drives economic growth.

Harlan Green © 2011

Posted in Consumers, Economy, Macro Economics, Weekly Financial News | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

What Decline of Western Civilization?

Posted on November 25, 2011 by Popular Economics Weekly

Financial FAQs

It’s hard to know whether Harvard Historian Niall Ferguson means what he says in his new book, “Civilization: The West and the Rest”; that the Western World’s 500 years of predominance are over, thanks to growing debt problems in the U.S. and Europe, and dwindling populations.

It’s true that the rest of the world is catching up to the developed West, and want what we have. For instance, the U.S. with 5 percent of the world’s population can no longer count on corralling 25 percent of its resources. Our military—a major source of budget deficits—is already stretched thin, for one thing, and can’t afford to invade another Iraq for its oil resources.

It’s also true that the U.S. has declined—not as a military power, but in almost all the measures of social and economic well-being. This is reflected in studies just now coming out by sociologists and psychologists, as well as economists. Richard Wilkinson is one such researcher who has managed to bring together a huge amount of research—especially on how income inequality affects citizens’ well-being.

We have discussed how this has affected individual states in past blogs, but never misery at the national level. The list is long. The U.S. has highest prison incarceration rate of any county, combined with the highest per capital income rate, with an income inequality level next to Bulgaria.

But does he really believe that the United States and Europe “will tip over from weakness to outright collapse”? It’s true that U.S. public debt has doubled over the last 10 years, but that is due to a very ill-advised shift of wealth to the top-most income brackets by conservative administrations over the past 30 years. It was epitomized by GW Bush’s attempt to fund 2 wars and a Medicare drug program without any public sacrifice—i.e., by borrowing the monies while lowering taxes.

And we know from the #OccupyWallStreet protests and economic historians that the growth in income inequality has reached its limit. It turns out most Americans did have to sacrifice—the 99 percent whose incomes stagnated because they didn’t benefit from the tax cuts, loopholes and such that have also elevated corporate profits as a share of GDP to the highest in history.

So Professor Ferguson really means the West will continue to decline if we continue on the path of Oligarchy, where a few at the top have most of the wealth, and the rest of us have to borrow to maintain our standard of living. Then wealth will continue to be transferred to the developing giants who are willing to lend us money—China, India and Brazil with their young and growing populations.

But Dr. Ferguson’s theme isn’t new. Root causes of the rise and fall of western civilizations were earlier explored by UCLA Professor Jared Diamond in his books “Guns, Germs, and Steel”, and “Collapse” in far more convincing fashion. Our technological superiority was enabled by having major resources such as oil, benign climates that allowed cultivation of the major foodstuffs, and domesticated animals that gave us immunity to the major diseases that have wiped out native populations where such animals didn’t exist.

It follows then that the major reason for the huge debt loads isn’t too much government. Governments can easily pay for public services if sufficient growth is kept up. But there has been a steady decline in economic growth rates in the U.S. since the 1970s, at the same time as wealth was being transferred upward, due mainly to those tax breaks given to the wealthy.

Such a wealth transfer also meant diminished income growth for the majority of Americans—the wage and salary earners who make up 80 percent of consumers. And so overall aggregate demand, which is the willingness of consumers and businesses to spend, is diminished. And we know that higher corporate profits have in fact created greater market instability, and so retarded economic growth rates. In his New York Times Op-ed, “It’s Consumer Spending, Stupid”, and various blogs, economic historian James Livingston says what has been known to most modern macro economists—consumer and government spending have driven economic growth over the past century, not corporate profits.

“So the “underlying cause” of the Great Depression, (as well as the Great Recession),” says Dr. Livingston, “was a distribution of income that, on the one hand, choked off growth in consumer durables—the industries that were the new sources of economic growth as such—and that, on the other hand, produced the tidal wave of surplus capital which produced the stock market bubble of the late-1920s.  By the same token, recovery from this economic disaster registered, and caused, a momentous structural change by making demand for consumer durables the leading edge of growth.”      

 

Therefore, said underlying causes of decline may not be at all what Professor Ferguson contends, since the cure must be a redistribution of wealth back to those who generate it, the middle and lower working classes.

Harlan Green © 2011

Posted in Consumers, Economy, Keynesian economics, Weekly Financial News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Let’s Put Americans Back to Work

Posted on November 15, 2011 by Popular Economics Weekly

Financial FAQs

It’s becoming evident that rather than political gridlock, such as the congressional supercommittee’s obsession with spending cuts, we need to worry about economic growth and jobs. And there are some very good ideas on how to do that, such as in President Bill Clinton’s newest book, “Back to Work”.  And economists such as Christina Romer, former Chairman of Obama’s Council of Economic Advisors, in a recent New York Times Op-ed are pleading with the Fed’s Ben Bernanke to actually target a growth rate that will both create jobs and keep inflation within a manageable range.

What? You mean the Federal Reserve’s QE-1, 2, and 3 buying of securities wasn’t doing just that? Well, no. It has accomplished the goal of keeping both short and long term interest rates low, but that hasn’t done anything for setting expectations of higher growth. In fact, the Fed just downgraded its own predictions of future growth. If anything, such low interest rates reflect deflationary expectations, which is the real problem. Companies won’t hire if they can’t raise prices, while consumers’ incomes fall in such an environment, stifling demand.

Dr. Romer and other major economists are beginning to insist the Fed should actually set what is called ‘nominal’ (i.e., before inflation accounted for) Gross Domestic Product growth target at the long term growth rate of around 5 percent. That way, expectations are raised for economic growth, without abandoning an inflation target of say, 2 percent, the current Fed inflation target.

How else can we boost demand for goods and services that is the actual driver of economic growth? We have discussed in a prior column how necessary it is for consumers—who power 70 percent of growth—to spend more, which in turn creates greater demand, which in turn creates more jobs in a virtuous circle. But they won’t if their confidence remains low, which surveys show causes them to spend less.

Former President Clinton has much more to say in “Back to Work” that directly addresses how to put Americans back to work, and he should know. “..during my administration we had four surplus budgets and began to pay down the national debt,” he says; we eliminated sixteen thousand pages of federal regulations; we cut taxes on the middle class, working families of modest means, and income from capital gains; we reduced the size of the federal workforce to its lowest level since 1960, and the economy produced 22.7 million new jobs.”

How did he do it? By emphasizing cooperation rather than competition between government and the private sector. “I believe the only way we can keep the American Dream alive for all Americans and continue to be the world’s leading force for freedom and prosperity, peace and security,” said Clinton, “is to have both a strong, effective private sector and a strong, effective government that work together to promote an economy of good jobs, rising incomes, increasing exports, and greater energy independence.”

Why is strong government so important? It is what engenders both business and consumer confidence, which are still at record lows. And without that confidence, consumers won’t spend to keep up demand, as we said, and businesses won’t hire in anticipation of higher growth.

clip_image002

Confidence from both the Conference Board and University Michigan surveys has remained at recession levels since 2008, really. And we know it a major reason for such low confidence is both political gridlock, and the S&P downgrade of U.S. Treasury bonds to AA+. This is what it means to lose confidence in our institutions, readers. Also, the subprime debacle that brought on the housing bubble caused a major loss of confidence in our Too Big To Fail financial institutions, which were allowed to gamble with their investors’ monies, and then be bailed out by taxpayer money.

But the confidence measures have stood in contrast to strength in consumer spending. If recent gains for confidence can be extended in the weeks ahead, the economic outlook as well as expectations for holiday shopping will improve. Some thawing in the jobs market may be helping with sentiment, says Econoday.

So confidence has to be restored in all of our institutions if we want to bring back economic growth. “What’s the smart, effective way to do that?” asks Clinton. “With a strong economy and a strong government working together to advance shared opportunity, shared responsibility, and shared prosperity? Or with a weak government and powerful interest groups who scorn shared prosperity in favor of winner take all until it’s all gone?”

Studies have shown that only by sharing prosperity can we really create strong economic growth. And right now we rank near the bottom in income inequality, according to the much cited CIA World Factbook. So there is a lot of work to be done to restore confidence in Americans’ future.

Harlan Green © 2011

Posted in Consumers, Economy, Macro Economics, Weekly Financial News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Employment Report Means Holiday Cheers!

Posted on November 12, 2011 by Popular Economics Weekly

Popular Economics Weekly

Not only were the employment numbers for the past 3 months much higher than originally estimated, but job openings are growing. All we need now is for consumers’ credit conditions to ease to bring back their confidence.

Much of the pessimism and predictions of a second recession were based on faulty data, and that has caused lenders to pull back. For instance, instead of 0 job growth in August that scared the markets, more than 104,000 jobs were created after ‘revisions’ to the seasonal adjustments that we have discussed in past columns. In fact, payroll jobs in October posted a gain of 80,000 after rising a revised 158,000 in September (originally 103,000).  So revisions for August and September were up net 102,000.

In fact, consumers are spending for the holidays as if the Great Recession is finally over, in spite of still uncertain income and credit conditions. The caveat: It took 23 months for consumption per person to return to its pre-recession level in earlier recessions. At 42 months, personal consumption has not yet returned to 2007 pre-recession levels, though some of that consumption was fueled by the housing bubble and may not be desirable, says Kevin Lansing of the San Francisco Federal Reserve.

clip_image002

Graph: Calculated Risk

Firstly, the number of job openings in September was 3.4 million, up from 3.1 million in August. Although the number of job openings remained below the 4.4 million openings when the recession began in December 2007, the level in September was 1.2 million higher than in July 2009 (the most recent trough for the series). The number of job openings has increased 38 percent since the end of the recession in June 2009, which tells us growth is picking up. We should therefore see 3 percent plus GDP growth for the rest of this year, at least, contrary to the Federal Reserve’s downwardly revised forecasts.

clip_image004

The consensus expected unemployment to be stuck at 9.1 percent instead of dropping to 9 percent in the Labor Department’s October household report, which tracks self-employeds as well.  The unemployment rate declined largely on a sizeable 277,000 boost in household employment which has posted significant increases for three months in a row.  The increases in August and September were 331,000 and 398,000, respectively.

And there is additional favorable news in the household survey.  Part-time employment for economic reasons is down and the duration of unemployment declined in October.  In nonagricultural industries, the number of those employed part time instead of full time for economic reasons dropped 328,000, says Econoday.

By downgrading its growth estimates, the Fed is leaving the door open for additional ease with the emphasis on significant downside risks remaining. For real GDP, the central tendency forecast for 2011 is now a 1.6 to 1.7 percent versus the prior range of 2.7 to 2.9 percent.  The large downgrade likely is due to a large downside miss to second quarter growth.  (But we believe growth will also be upgraded in coming months.) For 2012, forecast growth is 2.5 to 2.9 percent versus June’s 3.3 to 3.7 percent.   For 2013, forecast growth is 3.0 to 3.5 percent versus June’s 3.5 to 4.2 percent.   The Fed doesn’t see sustained growth until 2014—a range of 3.0 percent to 3.9 percent.

clip_image006

And early data for October on actual purchases by consumers indicate that this sector is doing better than suggested by surveys on the consumer mood, as we said.  Thanks to the one area where credit is easing, unit new motor vehicle sales rose 1.2 percent in October after surging 8.0 percent the month before. October’s sales pace was 13.3 million units annualized, compared to 13.1 million in September.

clip_image008

The bottom line is that credit is still being tightened in most areas, according to the Federal Reserve’s October 2011 Senior Loan Officer Opinion Survey on Bank Lending Practices. Fewer domestic banks eased standards and terms on commercial and industrial (C&I) loans over the third quarter compared with recent quarters, particularly on loans to large and middle-market firms, said the survey. And all of the domestic and foreign respondents that reported having tightened standards or terms on C&I loans cited a less favorable or more uncertain economic outlook as a reason for the tightening.

And so consumers will have to be patient, if they want to see credit standards easing for such as home loans. We hope the HARP II loan modification program that allows lowered payments and shortened payoff terms Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac-owned mortgages, though no principal reduction, will spur refinances and thus many to move out of their homes to find new jobs to be helpful.

The bottom line is that consumers are borrowing again, but for longer term purchases and still reducing their credit card debt, in part because banks are still restricting credit card use. Consumer credit expanded $7.4 billion in September benefiting once again from strength in nonrevolving credit, said the Federal Reserve’s latest Consumer Credit report. So-called installment loans outstanding, reflecting strong vehicle sales, rose $8.0 billion in the month to $1.66 trillion. This offsets another contraction in revolving credit, down $0.6 billion to $789.6 billion outstanding.

Harlan Green © 2011

Posted in Economy, housing market, Macro Economics, Weekly Financial News | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Dear Supercommittee: “It’s Consumer Spending, Stupid!”

Posted on November 3, 2011 by Popular Economics Weekly

Financial FAQs

“With only about a month remaining before its recommendations are due, lawmakers on the congressional supercommittee charged with finding savings from the federal budget wrestled with cuts to defense, foreign aid and other programs on Wednesday”, said Bloomberg Marketwatch.

But the historical record tells us that finding “savings” in government spending will shrink, not expand economic growth. And so finding savings that aren’t spent elsewhere on stimulus programs won’t in fact reduce the federal deficit, which depends on increased growth. So once again as Paul Krugman has said, “And those who are determined to forget the past run a high risk of reliving it — which is why we’re in the state we’re in.”

At the risk of stealing the title from a New York Times Op-ed by economic historian and Rutger’s Professor James Livingston, “It’s Consumer Spending, Stupid”, we now have historical data verifying that consumers and government spending have driven economic growth over the past century, not corporate profits. This should not be surprising given that consumer spending now makes up 70 percent of economic activity.

Professor Livingston’s apostasy is letting us in on the “best kept secret of the last century: private investment—that is, using business profits to increase productivity and ouput—doesn’t actually drive economic growth. Consumer debt and government spending actually do”.

This is blasphemy to the classical orthodoxy, needless to say, but a truth that the #OccupyWallStreet protests recognize. Livingston says, in fact “…corporate profits are…just restless sums of surplus capital, ready to flood speculative markets at home and abroad. In the 1920s, they inflated the stock market bubble, and then caused the Great Crash. Since the Reagan revolution, these superfluous profits have fed corporate mergers and takeovers, driven the dot-com craze, financed the “shadow banking” system of hedge funds and securitized investment vehicles, fueled monetary meltdowns in every hemisphere and inflated the housing bubble.”

clip_image002

Graph: Congressional Budget Office

This also tells why this recovery has been so frustratingly anemic. It isn’t consumer debt, as much as the lack of income that has prevented consumers from spending enough to boost economic growth. There has been almost no household income growth above inflation since the 1970s, mainly because so much wealth was siphoned off to the wealthiest via tax loopholes and less progressive tax rates, according to the latest CBO study on income inequality.

It should no longer be a surprise to anyone that the share of income going to higher-income households rose, said the CBO study, while the share going to lower-income households fell. But it’s nice that the CBO is also providing more evidence, to whit:

  • The top fifth of the population saw a 10-percentage-point increase in their share of after-tax income.
  • Most of that growth went to the top 1 percent of the population.
  • All other groups saw their shares decline by 2 to 3 percentage points.

How do we know that it isn’t corporations reinvesting their profits that spurs growth? After all, between 1900 and 2000, real gross domestic product per capita (the output of goods and services per person) grew more than 600 percent.

We know because net business investment declined 70 percent as a share of G.D.P. over that century, says Professor Livingston. In 1900 almost all investment came from the private sector — from companies, not from government — whereas in 2000, most investment was either from government spending (out of tax revenues) or “residential investment,” which means consumer spending on housing, rather than business expenditure on plants, equipment and labor.

In other words, over the course of the last century, net business investment atrophied while G.D.P. per capita increased spectacularly. In other words, corporations decided to spend their profits elsewhere. “The architects of the Reagan revolution tried to reverse these trends as a cure for the stagflation of the 1970s, but couldn’t, said Livingston. In fact, private or business investment kept declining in the ’80s and after. Peter G. Peterson, a former commerce secretary, complained that real growth after 1982 — after President Ronald Reagan cut corporate tax rates — coincided with “by far the weakest net investment effort in our postwar history.”

So even cutting corporate taxes, the cry of conservatives today, hasn’t encouraged corporations to invest in future growth. Professor Livingston has done a great service in what may be a first—actually exploding the myth that profits drive growth. It also explodes the myth that corporations have their customers’ best interests at heart. For their customers are consumers in the main, and consumers’ incomes have not even kept up with inflation. The huge jump in labor productivity has not been shared by their employees, in other words.

On the other hand, it is the investor class that profited immensely from the myth that business investment creates jobs. Even though the historical record shows it merely bloated the financial sector from 8 percent to more than 20 percent of GDP over the past decade, which led to excessive speculation. It was excessive investments in new technology, for instance, that caused the dot-com bubble and market crash in 2000. Then came the housing bubble that resulted from overbuilding of housing, fuelled by too easy credit conditions.

“Consumer spending is not only the key to economic recovery in the short term; it’s also necessary for balanced growth in the long term,” says Professor Livingston. “If our goal is to repair our damaged economy, we should bank on consumer culture — and that entails a redistribution of income away from profits toward wages, enabled by tax policy and enforced by government spending. (The increased trade deficit that might result should not deter us, since a large portion of manufactured imports come from American-owned multinational corporations that operate overseas.)”.

We don’t need the traders and the C.E.O.’s and the analysts — the 1 percent — to collect and manage our savings. Instead, we consumers need to save less and spend more in the name of a better future. We don’t need to silence the ant, but we’d better start listening to the grasshopper, says Professor Livingston. 

So when will consumers—you and I, that is—wake up to the fact that the future is ours for the taking? 

Harlan Green © 2011

Posted in Economy, Keynesian economics, Weekly Financial News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment